ReviewFrontiers in medicine2026
Precision diagnostics in bronchiectasis: current advances in imaging, microbiology, biomarkers, and digital health.
Review in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bronchiectasis is a complex, chronic airway syndrome driven by a vicious cycle of irreversible bronchial dilatation, impaired mucociliary clearance, recurrent infection, and tissue-destructive inflammation. Reflecting its profound clinical heterogeneity, patients with identical structural damage on high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) often exhibit divergent profiles in airway microbiology, inflammatory endotypes, exacerbation frequencies, and therapeutic responses, indicating that static anatomical classification fails to capture disease complexity. Sole reliance on visual CT inspection, standard sputum cultures, and subjective symptom tracking misses the driving mechanisms of individual disease progression. Emerging modalities-artificial intelligence (AI)-driven quantitative imaging, molecular microbiology, high-throughput biomarker profiling, and digital remote monitoring-aim to address these gaps. Our analysis shows that while these tools cannot substitute for bedside clinical acumen, they clarify obscure phenotypes, expose actionable treatable traits, and enable earlier, preemptive strategies. This review evaluates these contemporary diagnostic frameworks in non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis, dissecting their clinical utility, evidentiary maturity, and the economic and logistical barriers to routine adoption. Given that current evidence remains fragmented, advancing the field demands standardized imaging protocols, transparent algorithmic pipelines, clinically actionable metagenomic reporting, and robust validation in underrepresented Asian and Chinese cohorts. The real challenge lies not in generating more data, but in integrating these heterogeneous, high-dimensional datasets into pragmatic, point-of-care decision pathways that improve patient outcomes without widening disparities in global healthcare delivery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.