Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42597328›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in medicine2026

Precision diagnostics in bronchiectasis: current advances in imaging, microbiology, biomarkers, and digital health.

Bowen Wu, Sha Lu, Haipeng Liu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Bowen WuDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Xiangzhou District People's Hospital, Zhuhai, China.
Sha LuDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Xiangzhou District People's Hospital, Zhuhai, China.
Haipeng LiuDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Xiangzhou District People's Hospital, Zhuhai, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bronchiectasis is a complex, chronic airway syndrome driven by a vicious cycle of irreversible bronchial dilatation, impaired mucociliary clearance, recurrent infection, and tissue-destructive inflammation. Reflecting its profound clinical heterogeneity, patients with identical structural damage on high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) often exhibit divergent profiles in airway microbiology, inflammatory endotypes, exacerbation frequencies, and therapeutic responses, indicating that static anatomical classification fails to capture disease complexity. Sole reliance on visual CT inspection, standard sputum cultures, and subjective symptom tracking misses the driving mechanisms of individual disease progression. Emerging modalities-artificial intelligence (AI)-driven quantitative imaging, molecular microbiology, high-throughput biomarker profiling, and digital remote monitoring-aim to address these gaps. Our analysis shows that while these tools cannot substitute for bedside clinical acumen, they clarify obscure phenotypes, expose actionable treatable traits, and enable earlier, preemptive strategies. This review evaluates these contemporary diagnostic frameworks in non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis, dissecting their clinical utility, evidentiary maturity, and the economic and logistical barriers to routine adoption. Given that current evidence remains fragmented, advancing the field demands standardized imaging protocols, transparent algorithmic pipelines, clinically actionable metagenomic reporting, and robust validation in underrepresented Asian and Chinese cohorts. The real challenge lies not in generating more data, but in integrating these heterogeneous, high-dimensional datasets into pragmatic, point-of-care decision pathways that improve patient outcomes without widening disparities in global healthcare delivery.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencebiomarkersbronchiectasisdigital healthmetagenomic next-generation sequencingmicrobiomeprecision medicinequantitative CT

Identifiers

PMID42597328
PMCPMC13468895

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.