Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42597320›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in physiology2026

The role of eosinophils and basophils in peripheral blood in liver injury: findings from a cross-sectional study of an external hospital-based dataset and the NHANES (2007-2012).

Shan Gao, Kewei Du, Meilong Zhang, Yue Ma, Juanhong He, Tuanjie Che, Linjing Li, Shangdi Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in physiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Shan Gao *Laboratory Medicine Center, The Second Hospital & Clinical Medical School, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China.
Kewei Du *Laboratory Medicine Center, The Second Hospital & Clinical Medical School, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China.
Meilong ZhangSchool of Public Health, Gansu University of Chinese Medicine, Lanzhou, China.
Yue MaLaboratory Medicine Center, The Second Hospital & Clinical Medical School, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China.
Juanhong HeLaboratory Medicine Center, The Second Hospital & Clinical Medical School, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China.
Tuanjie CheInnovation Center of Functional Genomics and Molecular Diagnostics Technology of Gansu Province, Lanzhou, China.
Linjing LiLaboratory Medicine Center, The Second Hospital & Clinical Medical School, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China.
Shangdi ZhangLaboratory Medicine Center, The Second Hospital & Clinical Medical School, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: As a major global health concern, liver injury requires effective preventive and therapeutic measures. This study aimed to examine the relationship between eosinophil and basophil counts and liver injury. Methods: We analyzed two cohorts: 16, 328 subjects from a hospital-based dataset and 14, 962 individuals from the NHANES (2007-2012) database. After excluding cases with missing values, participants were categorized into groups with or without liver injury. Statistical analyses included weighted logistic regression (across three models), the XGBoost algorithm to identify critical factors, and restricted cubic spline analysis to explore non-linear relationships. Results: Statistical analyses revealed significant differences in eosinophil and basophil counts in peripheral blood between the liver injury and non-injury groups. Weighted logistic regression demonstrated a significant association between these cell counts and liver injury across all three models, independent of other covariates. The XGBoost algorithm identified eosinophil and basophil counts as critical factors for liver injury, ranking second and third in importance after age. Restricted cubic spline analysis showed a non-linear relationship between eosinophil count and the odds ratio (OR), with an optimal count of 0.2×10 Conclusion: These findings highlight eosinophil and basophil counts as potential risk factors for liver injury, providing valuable insights for its prevention and treatment.

Indexed as

basophil counteosinophil countliver injuryNHANESprognostic biomarker

Identifiers

PMID42597320
PMCPMC13467894

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.