ArticleMalawi medical journal : the journal of Medical Association of Malawi2026
Topographic and Morphometric Assessment of Facial Foramina in Maxilla, Mandible, and Zygomatic Bones: Anatomical and Clinical Relevance.
Article in Malawi medical journal : the journal of Medical Association of Malawi, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The anatomy of the zygomatic bone, maxilla, periorbital, and mental regions is important because important vessels and nerves pass through these regions. The zygomaticofacial nerve can be injured during facial surgeries, especially during zygomatic implant surgeries. Infraorbital and mental nerves are among the nerves blocked during local anesthesia in dentistry. Objective: To evaluate the topographic and morphometric characteristics of the zygomaticofacial, infraorbital, and mental foramina, and to determine their anatomical variations and clinical significance in order to provide guidance for maxillofacial surgical procedures and regional anesthesia applications. Methods: 30 dry human skull bones (60 sides) were examined. The distance of the zygomaticofacial foramen to the edge of the orbit, the distance to the lower end of the zygomaticomaxillary suture, the distance to the upper end of the zygomaticotemporal suture, and the distance to the infraorbital foramen were measured. The distance of the infraorbital foramen to the edge of the orbit and the lower end of the suture zygomaticomaxillaris was measured. Morphometric measurements of the mental foramen variations were examined. Results: Distance between infraorbital foramen and zygomaticomaxillary suture found 24.42 mm on the right; 25.21 mm on the left. It was statistically significant (p = 0.030). The location of the zygomaticofacial foramen was evaluated in four regions (A, B, C, and D), and the most frequent location was region A. Conclusion: Determining the area where the zygomaticofacial foramen is most commonly located will serve as a guide to help prevent nerve injury during facial surgery. It is important that there is no significant difference in the distances between the foramina on the right and left sides to facilitate surgical interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.