Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42597266›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of cancer research2026

An interpretable machine learning model for diagnostic classification of liver cancer using multivariable clinical data.

Dianyu Wang, Xiao Li, Zuheng Wang, Chunmeng Wei, Wenhao Lu, Rongbin Zhou, Leifeng Liang, Fubo Wang, Junyi Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of cancer research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Dianyu WangDepartment of Urology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University Quanzhou 362000, Fujian, China.
Xiao LiCenter for Genomic and Personalized Medicine, Guangxi Key Laboratory for Genomic and Personalized Medicine, University Engineering Research Center of Digital Medicine and Healthcare, Guangxi Medical University Nanning 530021, Guangxi, China.
Zuheng WangCenter for Genomic and Personalized Medicine, Guangxi Key Laboratory for Genomic and Personalized Medicine, University Engineering Research Center of Digital Medicine and Healthcare, Guangxi Medical University Nanning 530021, Guangxi, China.
Chunmeng WeiCenter for Genomic and Personalized Medicine, Guangxi Key Laboratory for Genomic and Personalized Medicine, University Engineering Research Center of Digital Medicine and Healthcare, Guangxi Medical University Nanning 530021, Guangxi, China.
Wenhao LuCenter for Genomic and Personalized Medicine, Guangxi Key Laboratory for Genomic and Personalized Medicine, University Engineering Research Center of Digital Medicine and Healthcare, Guangxi Medical University Nanning 530021, Guangxi, China.
Rongbin ZhouCenter for Genomic and Personalized Medicine, Guangxi Key Laboratory for Genomic and Personalized Medicine, University Engineering Research Center of Digital Medicine and Healthcare, Guangxi Medical University Nanning 530021, Guangxi, China.
Leifeng LiangDepartment of Oncology, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, The First People's Hospital of Yulin Yulin 537000, Guangxi, China.
Fubo WangCenter for Genomic and Personalized Medicine, Guangxi Key Laboratory for Genomic and Personalized Medicine, University Engineering Research Center of Digital Medicine and Healthcare, Guangxi Medical University Nanning 530021, Guangxi, China.
Junyi ChenDepartment of Urology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University Quanzhou 362000, Fujian, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this retrospective analysis, we used routinely collected clinical variables to develop a machine learning model for liver cancer diagnosis and examined the variables that contributed to model performance. We studied 3,629 people who were assessed because they were suspected to have liver cancer or other liver diseases. Patients who had pathologically confirmed liver cancer, and controls comprised of healthy subjects, patients with chronic hepatitis B, chronic hepatitis C, or cirrhosis. From 87 clinical parameters, least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression was applied to identify candidate predictors. Nine machine learning algorithms were then trained and tested through 10-fold cross-validation and external validation in an independent cohort. Performance of the models was measured based on area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, sensitivity, specificity, calibration and decision curve analysis. The variables that contributed most to discrimination included carbohydrate antigen 19-9, alpha-fetoprotein-related indicators, liver function parameters, and inflammatory markers. Among the nine algorithms, Extreme Gradient Boosting achieved the highest discriminative performance, with an AUC of 1.000 in the training cohort and 0.937 in the validation cohort. In the SHapley Additive exPlanations analysis, carbohydrate antigen 19-9 made the largest contribution to the final model. These findings suggest that machine learning algorithms, particularly Extreme Gradient Boosting, may integrate heterogeneous clinical indicators and provide a useful auxiliary tool for distinguishing liver cancer from non-liver cancer conditions in individuals undergoing clinical assessment. Further prospective validation in high-risk surveillance cohorts is required before the model can be applied to early risk prediction or population-level screening.

Indexed as

diagnostic classificationLiver cancermachine learningmultivariate clinical data

Identifiers

PMID42597266
PMCPMC13468238

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.