Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42597216›Full record

ArticlePregnancy (Hoboken, N.J.)2026

Toward optimizing social drivers of health screenings in prenatal care: Healthcare professional perspectives.

Melissa Berkowitz, Erica L Dixon, Jenna White, Tamar Klaiman, Sindhu K Srinivas, Rebecca F Hamm

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pregnancy (Hoboken, N.J.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Melissa BerkowitzDepartment of Medical Ethics and Health Policy University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-1844-0167
Erica L DixonDepartment of Medical Ethics and Health Policy University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA.
Jenna WhiteDepartment of Medical Ethics and Health Policy University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA.
Tamar KlaimanDepartment of Medical Ethics and Health Policy University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA.
Sindhu K SrinivasLeonard Davis Institute of Health Economics Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA.
Rebecca F HammLeonard Davis Institute of Health Economics Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: There is increased drive, including government-based mandates, to perform social drivers of health (SDoH) screenings across healthcare settings, without robust evidence to inform the process. Here, we aimed to understand perspectives of healthcare professionals (HCPs) around conducting SDoH screenings in a unique healthcare interaction, the prenatal care setting. Methods: We conducted a qualitative study with HCPs from February 20, 2023 to May 31, 2023 until thematic saturation was reached. Semi-structured interview guides were developed using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR 2.0). Interview domains included (1) HCPs' willingness to conduct screenings, (2) preferences on how to conduct screenings, (3) current and preferred referral processes based on screening results, and (4) hopes for the future. Results: A total of 15 HCPs were included. We found that most HCPs were willing to conduct SDoH screenings and understood their importance in patient care. HCPs also expressed concerns around the lack of resources to effectively conduct the screenings, noting lack of time, training, reimbursement, and a robust knowledge of the resource landscape to support patients who screened positive. It often fell on HCPs to take on additional work and emotional burden to support their patients. Conclusion: While HCPs feel positive about SDoH screenings in the prenatal care setting, it is important that they receive adequate support to conduct the screenings effectively. Emerging recommendations from this work include: maintain an up-to-date database of local resources and designate an individual who is well-versed in the resource landscape to support patients who screen positive, train all HCPs on SDoH and screening best practices, and implement incentives to support and acknowledge HCPs for their work.

Indexed as

health equityprenatalreferralsresource connectionsscreeningsSDoH

Identifiers

PMID42597216
PMCPMC13344829

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.