ArticlePregnancy (Hoboken, N.J.)2025
Maternal severe obesity and sonographic visualization of fetal anatomy.
Article in Pregnancy (Hoboken, N.J.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: We sought to investigate adequacy of fetal anatomic visualization in pregnant patients with BMI ≥ 50 kg/m Methods: This was a retrospective chart review of singleton pregnancies presenting for fetal anatomic survey from 18 0/7 to 21 6/7 weeks gestation between January 2019 and December 2020 at a single tertiary care center. The primary outcome was rate of anatomic survey completion stratified by body mass index (BMI) category, as defined by the World Health Organization. Severe obesity was defined as BMI ≥50 kg/m Results: Of 2372 anatomic surveys, 9.0% of patients were normal weight, 31.5% of patients were overweight, 54.7% of patients were obese (26.0% class I, 15.9% class II, 12.2% class III), and 4.8% of patients were with severe obesity. Rates of anatomic survey completion were highest in normal weight patients, and lowest in those with severe obesity (67.6% vs. 4.4%, Conclusions: Patients with severe obesity have extremely low rates of anatomic survey completion at the first attempt. The inability to adequately evaluate fetal anatomy in this patient population is especially concerning due to the higher baseline risk of fetal anomalies with increasing obesity. The healthcare disparity demonstrated in this data justifies further research on advancements in practice standards and technology in obstetric imaging.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.