SynthesisFrontiers in veterinary science2026
AI applications in veterinary digital health: a systematic survey.
Synthesis in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Veterinary medicine is experiencing a digital transformation driven by Artificial Intelligence (AI) applications in diagnostic imaging, disease prediction, clinical decision support, wearable monitoring, and telemedicine. This systematic survey, following the PRISMA 2020 reporting framework, synthesizes research published between 2013 and 2025 to categorize the taxonomy of AI applications, from convolutional neural networks for radiography to large language models (LLMs) for clinical consultation, and to evaluate the current state of AI and deep learning (DL) in veterinary digital health. Using predefined eligibility criteria, 22 studies met the inclusion criteria, comprising 18 primary evidence studies and 4 supporting domain/prototype studies. These studies were classified according to major application domains, including diagnostic imaging, predictive analytics, wearable monitoring, livestock health management, clinical decision support, and emerging LLM-based veterinary systems. The included studies indicate significant advancements in automated radiography, cytology, cardiovascular disease detection, dermatology, oncology, and clinical decision support, highlighting the potential of AI to enhance diagnostic accuracy, early disease detection, and clinical efficiency. Nevertheless, widespread clinical adoption is limited by fragmented datasets, species diversity, insufficient external validation, the opaque nature of many AI algorithms, and the absence of prospective real-world clinical evaluation. While LLM-based veterinary applications exhibit considerable promise, their implementation is still in its early stages, highlighting the necessity for rigorous validation prior to routine clinical use. This survey offers a structured synthesis of current AI applications in veterinary digital health and identifies key methodological limitations, implementation barriers, and future research priorities. Overall, the findings emphasize the importance of standardized datasets, robust model validation, explainable AI (XAI), and interdisciplinary collaboration to ensure the safe, reliable, and ethical integration of AI into veterinary medicine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.