ArticlePregnancy (Hoboken, N.J.)2026
Improving care coordination for socially complex perinatal patients: A human-centered design study.
Article in Pregnancy (Hoboken, N.J.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Designing novel solutions to address care fragmentation in the perinatal ecosystem requires rigorous evaluation of current workflows and engagement of the wide net of stakeholders supporting patient care. Human-centered design (HCD) is an established methodology for identifying challenges faced by patients and providers in clinical workflows, with the goal of producing actionable insights to inform interventions. This study used an HCD approach to (1) understand transitions of perinatal care within a safety-net system and (2) identify barriers that informed design opportunities to improve care coordination for socially complex pregnant patients. Methods: We conducted semi-structured interviews with patients, clinical providers (physicians, midwives, nurses, social workers), and community-based organization (CBO) staff working in a safety-net healthcare system. Interviews were analyzed using an HCD approach to inductive thematic analysis. Results: Thirty-four interviews were conducted with 42 participants, including 13 patients, 22 clinical providers, and seven community-based or public health stakeholders. We developed six insight statements, with themes centered around fragmented communication, limited integration between clinical and community systems, uncertainty surrounding information-sharing policies, and inconsistent implementation of substance-use-related protocols. Participants also highlighted disruptions to continuity of care and variability in discharge planning that contributed to confusion and eroded trust in the care team. Conclusions: Using an HCD approach, we identified key challenges in care coordination for socially complex perinatal patients. Interventions that seek to strengthen informational continuity between clinical and community-based providers offer promise for improved perinatal care delivery in safety-net systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.