Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42597153›Full record

ArticlePregnancy (Hoboken, N.J.)2025

Risk factors for and outcomes after unintended pregnancy: Evaluation in a contemporary cohort.

Nigel Madden, Timothy Wen, Madeline Perry, Ashish Premkumar, Lynn M Yee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pregnancy (Hoboken, N.J.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Nigel MaddenDivision of Maternal-Fetal Medicine Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine Chicago Illinois USA.
Timothy WenDivision of Biomedical Informatics and Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine University of California San Diego School of Medicine La Jolla California USA.
Madeline PerryDivision of Maternal-Fetal Medicine Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine Chicago Illinois USA.
Ashish PremkumarDivision of Maternal-Fetal Medicine University of Chicago School of Medicine Chicago Illinois USA.
Lynn M YeeDivision of Maternal-Fetal Medicine Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine Chicago Illinois USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Prior research has demonstrated associations between unintended pregnancy and adverse birth outcomes. The recent restrictions on abortion access may result in a rise in unintended pregnancy. Our objective was to comprehensively evaluate risk factors for and outcomes after unintended pregnancy in a contemporary cohort. Methods: Cross-sectional analysis of the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (2016-2020) respondents with singleton live births. The primary exposure was unintended pregnancy, including respondents who reported being unsure, had mistimed, or had undesired pregnancies. Models evaluated the association between unintended pregnancy and social determinants of health, selected using the US Department of Health and Human Services Healthy People 2030 conceptual framework. Multivariable regression models estimated the independent association between pregnancy intention and outcomes, including maternal healthcare utilization and maternal and neonatal outcomes. Secondary analyses evaluated the three subgroups of unintended pregnancies. Results: In this weighted population of 8.9 million respondents, 40.0% reported unintended pregnancy. Social determinants of health associated with unintended pregnancy included young age, non-Hispanic Black race, Hispanic ethnicity, being unmarried, more prior live births, more income dependents, and lower household income. Unintended pregnancy was associated with decreased healthcare utilization, including lower odds of prenatal care in the first trimester (aOR 0.60, 95% CI 0.57-0.63), adequate prenatal care (aOR 0.75, 95% CI 0.72-0.78), and postpartum visit attendance (aOR 0.88, 95% CI 0.83-0.94), but higher odds of using postpartum contraception (aOR 1.44, 95% CI 1.38-1.50). Unintended pregnancy was also associated with higher odds of adverse maternal outcomes including perinatal depression (during pregnancy, aOR 1.53, 95% CI 1.43-1.65; postpartum, aOR 1.29, 95% CI 1.22-1.37), and intimate partner violence (aOR 1.44, 95% CI 1.26-1.65), as well as lower odds of breastfeeding more than 3 months (aOR 0.90, 95% CI 0.86-0.94), but was not associated with neonatal outcomes. In secondary analyses, the three unintended pregnancy subgroups (mistimed, unsure, and undesired) were each individually associated with higher odds of adverse outcomes compared to intended pregnancy. Undesired pregnancy had the strongest associations with adverse outcomes, including higher odds of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (aOR 1.26, 95% CI 1.14-1.40). Conclusion: Unintended pregnancy is associated with adverse maternal outcomes in this contemporary cohort. Findings highlight populations that are vulnerable to the adverse consequences of unintended pregnancy, which is of particular importance in the era of restricted reproductive freedom.

Indexed as

health policymaternal morbiditypregnancy intentionpublic healthunintended pregnancy

Identifiers

PMID42597153
PMCPMC13344767

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.