ArticlePregnancy (Hoboken, N.J.)2025
Audit cycle improves the quality of assistance in the management of stillbirth: A 10 years' experience.
Article in Pregnancy (Hoboken, N.J.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Stillbirth represents a tragic event, affecting families as well as caregivers. Evidence suggests that a portion of stillbirths is preventable. The audit cycle is a method to improve healthcare. This study evaluates the effectiveness of this methodology applied within a Perinatal Surveillance System in improving the quality of care and its association with a lower proportion of potentially preventable stillbirths. Methods: We conducted a prospective evaluation of the quality of assistance and compared two 5-year periods (2014-2018 and 2019-2023) in the Emilia-Romagna Region (North of Italy). The audit cycle was implemented, as detailed in the text, in two steps: at local and central levels. In addition to temporal trends in its rate, stillbirth causes and their preventability were evaluated. Population features were also recorded. Univariable logistic regression models were used. Odds ratios (ORs) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were reported. Results: In the study period, 1041 stillbirths occurred. These stillbirths underwent the same diagnostic work-up and audit evaluation. The overall stillbirth rate was 0.33%. When comparing the two 5-year periods, the proportion increased slightly (0.313% vs. 0.354%). We observed a significant reduction in maternal conditions as the primary cause of stillbirth (OR, 0.34; 95% CI, 0.16-0.66) as well as unexplained cases (OR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.16-0.66) during the second 5-year period (2019-2023). The quality of assistance also improved over time, with the proportion of inadequate care decreasing from 9.92% in 2014-2018 to 6.71% in 2019-2023 (OR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.40-0.98). Conclusion: The audit cycle was associated with fewer preventable and unexplained stillbirths. The overall proportion increased slightly between periods, likely due to changing maternal risk factors, but the audit helped maintain a low rate and improve the quality of care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.