ArticlePregnancy (Hoboken, N.J.)2025
Perinatal healthcare inequities: A qualitative causal network analysis.
Article in Pregnancy (Hoboken, N.J.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Persistent healthcare inequities exist within the Military Health System (MHS). The objective of this study was to use qualitative interviews to assess the intersection of operational and cultural experiences of military service with the lived experience of individuals on their use and experience of perinatal health care. Methods: This is an IRB-approved qualitative study of the perinatal experience of servicemembers and TRICARE beneficiaries. A total of 36 semi-structured interviews were conducted with individuals who delivered an infant within the last 5 years. Causation coding and deductive methods were used to generate a variable list of antecedent variables, mediating variables, and outcomes. Themes were organized into causal chains based on participant stories. A causal network was developed using cross-case mapping to generate a thematic narrative from a systematic comparison of within-case causal networks. Results: A complex detailed causal network was developed, depicting structural and social factors affecting birth experiences. Such causal relationships impact individual experiences to varying degrees. Antecedent variables included experiences of dismissal, lack of support, concerns about the pregnancy, knowledge of poor outcomes, family experiences, and systemic issues. Mediating variables included delays in care, lack of command support, fragmented care, microaggressions, and fear of medications and interventions. Outcomes included mistrust of the medical system, fear and anxiety, early cessation of human milk feeding, and decreased military retention. Conclusion: Comprehensive and logical pathways illustrate challenges faced by birthing individuals in the MHS. Results suggest that outcomes including mistrust, fear, anxiety, and early cessation of human milk feeding may be mediated by participant healthcare experiences and concerns.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.