ArticlePregnancy (Hoboken, N.J.)2026
An evaluation of antenatal corticosteroid use and timing in a large US birth cohort 2017-2021.
Article in Pregnancy (Hoboken, N.J.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: There is a lack of published data on the contemporary use and timing of antenatal corticosteroids in the United States. Our primary objective was to address this gap using clinical data from a large US birth cohort. Our secondary objective was to identify factors associated with optimally timed steroids in births <34 weeks' gestation. Methods: This retrospective study included de-identified clinical data from a quality improvement database for births at 24 Results: Of 105,981 patients included in the analysis, 6.1% (6443) received steroids before 37 weeks' gestation. A total of 83.1% of live births <34 weeks' gestation received antenatal steroids, but only 55.4% received optimally timed steroids. The rate of optimally timed steroids in births <34 weeks' gestation was stable between 2017 and 2021. Over the same period, the proportion of births at 34 Conclusion: In our study, most patients who delivered at <34 weeks' gestation received at least one dose of antenatal corticosteroids, but this was outside of the optimal 7-day window in approximately half of cases. Quality improvement efforts should focus on timing, as well as the use of antenatal corticosteroids.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.