ArticlePregnancy (Hoboken, N.J.)2025
Early pregnancy placental biomarkers as predictors of preeclampsia with severe features.
Article in Pregnancy (Hoboken, N.J.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Multiple studies have evaluated late second and third trimester values for soluble Fms-like tyrosine kinase 1 (sFlt-1), placental-like growth factor (PlGF), and sFlt-1:PlGF ratio for preeclampsia risk stratification, but few studies have assessed sFlt-1:PlGF ratio earlier in pregnancy. Objective: To investigate the utility of early pregnancy sFlt-1:PlGF ratio for predicting preeclampsia with severe features, and to compare its predictive ability with that of the United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) risk assessment algorithm. Methods: This was a secondary analysis of the Nulliparous Pregnancy Outcomes Study: Monitoring Mothers-to-be (nuMoM2b). Of 10,038 participants, 1977 (enriched for adverse outcomes) had blood, which had been drawn at the first (6w0d-13w6d) and second (16w0d-21w6d) visits, assayed for sFlt-1 and PlGF, allowing for the calculation of sFlt-1:PlGF ratios from both visits as well as the change between visits. The primary outcome for this analysis was preeclampsia with severe features. The predictive ability of the sFlt-1:PlGF ratio was compared to that of the USPSTF risk assessment algorithm using area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUROC). Youden indexes were used to identify optimal sFlt-1:PlGF ratio cut-points. The predictive characteristics of these cut-points were compared to those of a positive USPSTF risk assessment result. Results: Preeclampsia with severe features was diagnosed in 240 (12.1%) eligible participants, among whom the mean gestational age at delivery was 36w0d. The optimal sFlt-1:PlGF ratio for predicting this outcome was 19.1 at visit 1, 6.2 at visit 2, and a decrease of 15.0 between visits. The sFlt-1:PlGF ratio was inferior to the USPSTF risk assessment algorithm in predicting this diagnosis (AUROC: 0.51-0.60 vs. 0.60, Conclusions: Early pregnancy sFLt-1:PlGF ratio is a poor risk assessment tool for preeclampsia with severe features.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.