ArticlePregnancy (Hoboken, N.J.)2025
Short interpregnancy interval following reproductive coercion: A prospective cohort study of pregnant Ethiopian women.
Article in Pregnancy (Hoboken, N.J.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Rural-Urban Differences in the Association Between Reproductive Coercion and Postpartum Family Planning.Studies in family planning · 2026Article
- Prevalence and correlates of reproductive coercion in the months before pregnancy: cross-sectional findings from pregnant women in Ethiopia.Reproductive health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Short interpregnancy intervals (IPIs) (< 12 months) remain a public health concern in low- and middle-income countries due to their association with adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes. Reproductive coercion (RC), which involves intimate partner behaviors that interfere with women's reproductive decisions, undermines autonomy, and increases the risk of unintended pregnancy. This exploratory study examines the relationship between RC and short IPIs. Methods: Data come from a prospective cohort (2019-2021) of pregnant Ethiopian women aged 15-49, followed up to 1 year postpartum ( Findings: Overall, 27.3% of women experienced RC before their index pregnancy, and 4.4% had a subsequent pregnancy within 12 months of giving birth (IPI range: 3-12 months). Among women who experienced any RC, less severe RC, or more severe RC, 5.8%, 5.5%, and 6.2%, respectively, had short IPIs, compared to 3.8% of those who did not experience RC. Any RC was associated with a marginally higher risk of short IPI compared to no RC (HR: 1.55, 95% CI: 0.97-2.48, Interpretation: Women who experience more severe RC may face an elevated risk of short IPI. The observed dose-response trend between RC severity and short IPI warrants further investigation to better understand how RC may impact pregnancy spacing. Clarifying the role of RC in short IPIs could help identify factors that limit women's reproductive autonomy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.