ArticlePregnancy (Hoboken, N.J.)2025
A qualitative study of barriers and facilitators to low-dose aspirin adherence in pregnancy.
Article in Pregnancy (Hoboken, N.J.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Lived experiences of women prescribed low-dose aspirin for preeclampsia prevention: a phenomenological study.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2026Article
- Clinical care team perspectives on universal low-dose aspirin in pregnancy.Pregnancy (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: To explore barriers and facilitators to low-dose aspirin (LDA) adherence among pregnant participants of low socioeconomic status through application of a theoretical framework of behavior change. Methods: This study occurred between April and July 2023 at an urban tertiary care center's prenatal clinic, which serves participants of low socioeconomic status. This study was nested in the pre-implementation phase of a planned universal LDA quality improvement program. Participants were individually interviewed in their native language (English or Spanish) using questions based on the Theoretical Domains Framework. Analysis was completed using an integrated approach using grounded theory and a priori themes from the established framework, which revealed the most salient themes and subthemes. Participants also took the Patient Medication Adherence Scale, which quantitatively assessed medication adherence as well as knowledge surrounding medication use. Results: Twenty-four participants were interviewed, with the majority ( Conclusion: Using insights gained on barriers and facilitators to LDA adherence across multiple behavioral domains, we propose a three-pronged approach to guide LDA quality improvement efforts with a focus on patient education, provider communication, and clinical resources. Future work should systematically evaluate the impact of patient-informed interventions on LDA adherence in this patient population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.