Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42597078›Full record

ArticlePregnancy (Hoboken, N.J.)2025

Maternal mortality according to state abortion legislative climate following the US Supreme Court's

Emily Nuss, Mari Iwasaki, Lindsay Robbins, Peggy Ye, Misa Hayasaka, George Saade, Tetsuya Kawakita

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pregnancy (Hoboken, N.J.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Emily NussEVMS Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Macon & Joan Brock Virginia Health Sciences at Old Dominion University Norfolk Virginia USA.
Mari IwasakiMD Program Ross University School of Medicine Miramar Florida USA.
Lindsay RobbinsEVMS Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Macon & Joan Brock Virginia Health Sciences at Old Dominion University Norfolk Virginia USA.
Peggy YeDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology MedStar Washington Hospital Center Washington District of Columbia USA.
Misa HayasakaEVMS Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Macon & Joan Brock Virginia Health Sciences at Old Dominion University Norfolk Virginia USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-3130-5233
George SaadeEVMS Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Macon & Joan Brock Virginia Health Sciences at Old Dominion University Norfolk Virginia USA.
Tetsuya KawakitaEVMS Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Macon & Joan Brock Virginia Health Sciences at Old Dominion University Norfolk Virginia USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2438-1699

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: We aimed to evaluate how maternal mortality rates have evolved across US states following the Dobbs ruling, while accounting for the confounding influence of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Study design: We conducted a retrospective analysis of publicly available data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Wide-ranging ONline Data for Epidemiologic Research (CDC WONDER) database from January 2018 to December 2024. This study period was divided into three intervals: (1) pre-COVID (January 2018 to February 2020), (2) pandemic (March 2020 to September 2022), and (3) post-Dobbs (October 2022 to December 2024). Using the Kaiser Family Foundation classification, we designated 13 states as abortion-prohibited and 25 states plus the District of Columbia as abortion-supportive, based on contemporaneous legislation. The remaining 12 states were excluded from the analysis. Our primary outcome was maternal mortality, defined as "the death of a woman while pregnant or within 42 days of termination of pregnancy." To account for the clustering of outcomes by state, we employed generalized estimating equations with a Poisson distribution to compute difference-in-difference (DID) estimates with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs). Results: Among 19,023,203 births included in the analysis, 6,633,011 (34.9%) occurred in abortion-prohibited states, and 12,390,192 (65.1%) occurred in abortion-supportive states. In all study periods, abortion-prohibited states exhibited higher maternal mortality rates than abortion-supportive states. This disparity widened notably during the pandemic period (DID 8.7 [95% CI 2.6, 14.7] per 100,000 births). In contrast, the post-Dobbs period was not associated with a further increase in this overall disparity (DID -0.7 [95% CI -6.1, 4.7] per 100,000 births). When each abortion-prohibited state was compared individually to the pooled abortion-supportive states, Texas and Louisiana showed a widening maternal mortality disparity in the post-Dobbs period compared to the pre-COVID period. Conversely, Alabama, Arkansas, Indiana, Kentucky, Mississippi, and South Dakota demonstrated a narrowing of this gap relative to abortion-supportive states. Conclusion: Maternal mortality rates remained consistently higher in abortion-prohibited states compared with abortion-supportive states throughout the study period. The COVID-19 pandemic substantially magnified these preexisting differences, whereas the Dobbs ruling exerted variable effects across individual states. These findings underscore both the persistent inequities in women's health outcomes and the urgency of implementing targeted policies to address and mitigate such disparities nationwide.

Indexed as

abortion legislationdifference‐in‐differencedisparityinequity

Identifiers

PMID42597078
PMCPMC13344511

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.