Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42597075›Full record

ArticlePregnancy (Hoboken, N.J.)2026

Prioritizing patient-centered research in adult congenital heart disease and pregnancy: Findings from Phase 3 of a multiphase national initiative.

Kashvi Singh, Mindi Messmer, Rohan D'Souza, Melissa Russo, Jamie Jackson, Katia Bravo-James, Jennifer Cortes, Yonitan Buber, Michael Earing, Ayesha Abusbeitan and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pregnancy (Hoboken, N.J.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Kashvi SinghDivision of Cardiology Children's National Hospital Washington District of Columbia USA.
Mindi MessmerDivision of Cardiology Children's National Hospital Washington District of Columbia USA.
Rohan D'SouzaDepartments of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Health Research Methods, Evidence & Impact McMaster University Hamilton Ontario Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4049-2017
Melissa RussoDepartment of Maternal-Fetal Medicine & Reproductive Genetics, Warren Alpert School of Medicine Brown University Providence Rhode Island USA.
Jamie JacksonAbigail Wexner Research Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital Columbus Ohio USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1752-1377
Katia Bravo-JamesDepartment of Cardiology Mayo Clinic Jacksonville Florida USA.
Jennifer CortesAdult Congenital Heart Association Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA.
Yonitan BuberDepartment of Cardiology University of Washington Seattle Washington USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0975-7363
Michael EaringSections of Cardiovascular Medicine and Pediatric Cardiology University of Chicago-Medicine Chicago Illinois USA.
Ayesha AbusbeitanDivision of Cardiology Children's National Hospital Washington District of Columbia USA.
Wayne FranklinDivision of Cardiology Children's National Hospital Washington District of Columbia USA.
Scott LeezerCURA Strategies Washington District of Columbia USA.
Ruth PhillippiDivision of Cardiology Children's National Hospital Washington District of Columbia USA.
Anitha JohnDivision of Cardiology Children's National Hospital Washington District of Columbia USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7355-6304

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Despite advancements in care, pregnant individuals with congenital heart disease (CHD) face disproportionately high risks. Objectives: To address these challenges, a national consortium was established to improve maternal outcomes in CHD through multidisciplinary collaboration and patient engagement. Study design: As part of a 2.5-year multi-phase consortium initiative, an in-person research summit followed by three virtual focus groups (Project PHASE 3) was conducted with patients, clinicians, researchers, advocates, and policy representatives. Qualitative data were collected, and reflexive thematic analysis was performed to identify shared priorities. Results: A total of 48 individuals participated in the in-person meeting, including 18 patients (83% female; 11% Black/African American, 17% Asian, 11% Hispanic, 61% White) and 30 clinicians/researchers. An additional 19 patients (100% female; 32% rural/non-urban; 16% Black/African American, 10% Hispanic, 74% White) participated in virtual focus groups. Key priorities identified included improved patient-healthcare provider communication, expanded access to multidisciplinary and adult CHD-specialized care, and greater inclusion of patient voices in reproductive planning and research. Focus groups underscored racial disparities in care, limited CHD education for patients of color, and the need for culturally tailored resources. Participants emphasized the importance of representative research cohorts, integration of genetic counseling, and dissemination of research in accessible, plain-language formats. Conclusions: Findings demonstrate the value of integrating patient expertise and partnership in shaping cardio-obstetric research, care models, and education. Addressing maternal health concerns in CHD research requires both structural changes and community-driven, inclusive research strategies.

Indexed as

congenital heart diseasematernal outcomespatient‐centered researchpatient engagementpregnancy

Identifiers

PMID42597075
PMCPMC13344781

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.