ArticlePregnancy (Hoboken, N.J.)2026
Prioritizing patient-centered research in adult congenital heart disease and pregnancy: Findings from Phase 3 of a multiphase national initiative.
Article in Pregnancy (Hoboken, N.J.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- From Insight to Action: A National Patient-Centered Strategic Framework for Improving Reproductive Health Outcomes in Individuals With Congenital Heart Disease.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Despite advancements in care, pregnant individuals with congenital heart disease (CHD) face disproportionately high risks. Objectives: To address these challenges, a national consortium was established to improve maternal outcomes in CHD through multidisciplinary collaboration and patient engagement. Study design: As part of a 2.5-year multi-phase consortium initiative, an in-person research summit followed by three virtual focus groups (Project PHASE 3) was conducted with patients, clinicians, researchers, advocates, and policy representatives. Qualitative data were collected, and reflexive thematic analysis was performed to identify shared priorities. Results: A total of 48 individuals participated in the in-person meeting, including 18 patients (83% female; 11% Black/African American, 17% Asian, 11% Hispanic, 61% White) and 30 clinicians/researchers. An additional 19 patients (100% female; 32% rural/non-urban; 16% Black/African American, 10% Hispanic, 74% White) participated in virtual focus groups. Key priorities identified included improved patient-healthcare provider communication, expanded access to multidisciplinary and adult CHD-specialized care, and greater inclusion of patient voices in reproductive planning and research. Focus groups underscored racial disparities in care, limited CHD education for patients of color, and the need for culturally tailored resources. Participants emphasized the importance of representative research cohorts, integration of genetic counseling, and dissemination of research in accessible, plain-language formats. Conclusions: Findings demonstrate the value of integrating patient expertise and partnership in shaping cardio-obstetric research, care models, and education. Addressing maternal health concerns in CHD research requires both structural changes and community-driven, inclusive research strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.