Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42597074›Full record

ArticlePregnancy (Hoboken, N.J.)2025

Effectiveness and Safety of Intravenous Iron Therapy in Outpatient Obstetrical Clinic for Treatment of Iron-Deficiency Anemia During Pregnancy.

Ellen M Murrin, Olivia S LeBeau, Lillian Singer, Mark A Kassab, Peyton Kalan, Julie Costanzo, Scott A Sullivan, George L Maxwell, George R Saade, Antonio F Saad

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pregnancy (Hoboken, N.J.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Ellen M MurrinDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine Inova Fairfax Hospital Falls Church Virginia USA.
Olivia S LeBeauDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine Inova Fairfax Hospital Falls Church Virginia USA.
Lillian SingerDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine Inova Fairfax Hospital Falls Church Virginia USA.
Mark A KassabDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine Inova Fairfax Hospital Falls Church Virginia USA.
Peyton KalanDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine Inova Fairfax Hospital Falls Church Virginia USA.
Julie CostanzoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine Inova Fairfax Hospital Falls Church Virginia USA.
Scott A SullivanDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine Inova Fairfax Hospital Falls Church Virginia USA.
George L MaxwellDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine Inova Fairfax Hospital Falls Church Virginia USA.
George R SaadeDivision of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology Eastern Virginia Medical School Norfolk Virginia USA.
Antonio F SaadDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine Inova Fairfax Hospital Falls Church Virginia USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Iron-deficiency anemia (IDA) affects over one-third of pregnant patients globally, contributing to severe maternal morbidity and adverse neonatal outcomes. Oral iron supplementation, while cost-effective, is limited by poor absorption, significant gastrointestinal side effects, and poor adherence. The use of intravenous (IV) iron addresses many of these concerns, including eliminating GI side effects and the need for daily therapy. However, administration of IV iron in pregnant patients is typically restricted to specialized infusion centers or hospitals due to concerns about acute side effects, cost, resource utilization, the need for fetal heart rate monitoring, and extended infusion times. Methods: This descriptive study evaluated the implementation, safety, and feasibility of outpatient IV iron infusions for pregnant patients with IDA, with maternal hemoglobin response and outcomes reported as secondary findings. Patients received a single or series of doses of IV iron spaced weekly, with hemoglobin levels monitored before and after treatment. No fetal heart tracing was performed. Antepartum patients treated with IV iron at our outpatient obstetric clinic from 2017 to 2024 were identified retrospectively, and their charts were reviewed. Results: A total of 417 pregnant patients received IV iron (87.3% iron sucrose; 12.7% Ferric Carboxymaltose); 65.9% received ≥600 mg total dose (2-3 dose protocol), while 34.1% received lower cumulative doses (1-2 infusions). Therapy was well-tolerated with no anaphylactic reactions reported. Side effects were experienced in only 11.5% of patients and were relatively minor, with dizziness (6.2%), headache (1.9%), and hypotension (1.7%) being the most common. Adverse maternal outcomes (PPH, ICU admission, blood transfusions, and re-admissions) were low, particularly in patients who received the last infusion more than 10 days before delivery. Neonatal outcomes included a 7.4% NICU admission rate and a 3.5% rate of infants weighing less than 2500 g. Mean hemoglobin increased by 1.5 g/dL, consistent with prior studies. Conclusion: This study demonstrates that IV iron therapy can be safely given in obstetrical clinics without significant maternal or fetal safety concerns. This obviates the need for more resource-intensive and costly settings such as infusion or hospital-based centers.

Indexed as

antenatal carehemoglobin levelsintravenous iron therapyiron‐deficiency anemiamaternal healthoutpatient treatmentpregnancy

Identifiers

PMID42597074
PMCPMC13344561

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.