Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42597070›Full record

ReviewPregnancy (Hoboken, N.J.)2026

Maternal outcomes following prenatal spina bifida repair: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Nikan Zargarzadeh, Ehsan Rojhani, Ali Javinani, May Abiad, Enaja Sambatur, Eyal Krispin, Ashish Premkumar, Ramen H Chmait, Ramesha Papanna, Jena Lyn Miller and 2 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pregnancy (Hoboken, N.J.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Nikan ZargarzadehFetal Care and Surgery Center (FCSC) Division of Fetal Medicine and Surgery Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School Boston Massachusetts USA.
Ehsan RojhaniFetal Care and Surgery Center (FCSC) Division of Fetal Medicine and Surgery Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School Boston Massachusetts USA.
Ali JavinaniDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology George Washington University Hospital Washington District of Columbia USA.
May AbiadDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology Baptist Medical Group, Baptist Memorial Health Care Memphis Tennessee USA.
Enaja SambaturFetal Care and Surgery Center (FCSC) Division of Fetal Medicine and Surgery Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School Boston Massachusetts USA.
Eyal KrispinFetal Care and Surgery Center (FCSC) Division of Fetal Medicine and Surgery Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School Boston Massachusetts USA.
Ashish PremkumarDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology Section of Maternal Fetal Medicine Pritzker School of Medicine at the University of Chicago Chicago Illinois USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6952-9955
Ramen H ChmaitDivision of Maternal-Fetal Medicine Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California Los Angeles California USA.
Ramesha PapannaDivision of Fetal Intervention Department of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences McGovern Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Center Houston Texas USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3801-346X
Jena Lyn MillerJohns Hopkins Center for Fetal Therapy Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine Baltimore Maryland USA.
Kjersti AagaardFetal Care and Surgery Center (FCSC) Division of Fetal Medicine and Surgery Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School Boston Massachusetts USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2960-0371
Alireza A ShamshirsazFetal Care and Surgery Center (FCSC) Division of Fetal Medicine and Surgery Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School Boston Massachusetts USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6333-3177

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Prenatal surgical interventions for neural tube defects have been shown to improve fetal outcomes but are associated with previously poorly quantified maternal risk, which is inherently dependent on the surgical approach used. We hypothesized that a meta-analysis would enable objective quantitation of maternal risk and safety, stratified by which antenatal neural tube defect surgical approaches were employed. Study design: We conducted a meta-analysis by searching PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Web of Science databases. We included all studies that performed prenatal intrauterine neural tube defect repair, regardless of the surgical technique. Our primary safety measure outcomes were maternal mortality and severe maternal morbidity (inclusive of uterine rupture or dehiscence, blood transfusion, and pulmonary edema). A total of 26 studies published between 2010 and 2024 were selected, prioritizing larger sample sizes and relevant outcomes when populations overlapped. The meta-analysis was conducted using random-effects models to account for between-study heterogeneity, which was quantified using the Results: Our meta-analysis included a total of 1485 patients. No occurrence of maternal mortality was reported in any included studies (0/995). Some studies provided comprehensive data for all complications, while others only reported specific outcomes, leading to variation in case denominators: uterine rupture or dehiscence was observed in a pooled proportion of 4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 1%-11%), occurring in 7.4% of open surgery cases (53/710), 3.1% of mini-hysterotomy cases (6/192), and 0% of fetoscopic cases (0/157). Among 872 reported cases, maternal pulmonary edema occurred in 3% (pooled estimate: 0.03; 95% CI, 0.02-0.06). The lowest rate of pulmonary edema was seen with open surgical approaches (20 of 661 cases, 3%), followed by mini-hysterotomy (2 of 55 cases, 3.6%) and fetoscopic surgeries (15 of 159 cases, 9.4%). Model-adjusted pooled proportions demonstrated an overall low rate of maternal blood transfusion at 0.03 (95% CI, 0.01-0.05) among 971 cases. Conclusion: This study highlights the need for standardized and comprehensive reporting of maternal outcomes in fetal surgery in order to reliably counsel patients on anticipated and acceptable maternal risk. However, despite limited data, our findings suggest that maternal mortality is rare and that severe maternal complications occur infrequently; however, the potential for serious morbidity underscores the need for careful patient selection, counselling, and standardized outcome reporting.

Indexed as

fetal surgerymaternal complicationsmeta‐analysisneural tube defect

Identifiers

PMID42597070
PMCPMC13344694

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.