ReviewPregnancy (Hoboken, N.J.)2026
Maternal outcomes following prenatal spina bifida repair: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Review in Pregnancy (Hoboken, N.J.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Prenatal surgical interventions for neural tube defects have been shown to improve fetal outcomes but are associated with previously poorly quantified maternal risk, which is inherently dependent on the surgical approach used. We hypothesized that a meta-analysis would enable objective quantitation of maternal risk and safety, stratified by which antenatal neural tube defect surgical approaches were employed. Study design: We conducted a meta-analysis by searching PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Web of Science databases. We included all studies that performed prenatal intrauterine neural tube defect repair, regardless of the surgical technique. Our primary safety measure outcomes were maternal mortality and severe maternal morbidity (inclusive of uterine rupture or dehiscence, blood transfusion, and pulmonary edema). A total of 26 studies published between 2010 and 2024 were selected, prioritizing larger sample sizes and relevant outcomes when populations overlapped. The meta-analysis was conducted using random-effects models to account for between-study heterogeneity, which was quantified using the Results: Our meta-analysis included a total of 1485 patients. No occurrence of maternal mortality was reported in any included studies (0/995). Some studies provided comprehensive data for all complications, while others only reported specific outcomes, leading to variation in case denominators: uterine rupture or dehiscence was observed in a pooled proportion of 4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 1%-11%), occurring in 7.4% of open surgery cases (53/710), 3.1% of mini-hysterotomy cases (6/192), and 0% of fetoscopic cases (0/157). Among 872 reported cases, maternal pulmonary edema occurred in 3% (pooled estimate: 0.03; 95% CI, 0.02-0.06). The lowest rate of pulmonary edema was seen with open surgical approaches (20 of 661 cases, 3%), followed by mini-hysterotomy (2 of 55 cases, 3.6%) and fetoscopic surgeries (15 of 159 cases, 9.4%). Model-adjusted pooled proportions demonstrated an overall low rate of maternal blood transfusion at 0.03 (95% CI, 0.01-0.05) among 971 cases. Conclusion: This study highlights the need for standardized and comprehensive reporting of maternal outcomes in fetal surgery in order to reliably counsel patients on anticipated and acceptable maternal risk. However, despite limited data, our findings suggest that maternal mortality is rare and that severe maternal complications occur infrequently; however, the potential for serious morbidity underscores the need for careful patient selection, counselling, and standardized outcome reporting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.