ArticlePregnancy (Hoboken, N.J.)2026
Association of COVID-19 mitigation measures with preterm birth and cervical length: A cohort study.
Article in Pregnancy (Hoboken, N.J.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: We have previously reported that, in metropolitan Melbourne, mitigation measures implemented to mitigate SARS-CoV-2 transmission were associated with a reduced preterm birth (PTB) rate, both in spontaneous and iatrogenic births <34 weeks. Here, we assess the impact of mitigation measures on PTB in relation to mid-pregnancy cervical length (CL). Methods: We conducted a comparative cohort study in three maternity hospitals in Melbourne, Australia, between women with a previous PTB <32 weeks who were exposed to COVID-19 mitigation measures while pregnant (lockdown cohort, estimated conception November 1, 2019 to February 29, 2020) and women who were pregnant before mitigation measures (pre-lockdown cohort, estimated conception November 1, 2018 to February 28, 2019). In our clinics, women with a previous PTB <32 weeks routinely undergo targeted assessment of CL at around 20 weeks. Within each cohort, we assessed the relationship between CL and perinatal outcomes. Results: We studied 113 women, of whom 60 were in the lockdown group and 53 in the pre-lockdown group. Baseline characteristics, including CL measurements taken on average at 20.4 and 20.3 weeks of gestation, respectively, were comparable. Mean CL was 38.4 ± 8.8 mm versus 35.8 ± 9.7 mm ( Conclusion: COVID-19 mitigation measures were associated with a reduction in PTB. The predictive capacity of CL disappeared during mitigation measures. This effect may be attributed to a reduction of PTB in women with a short CL. While the underlying mechanism remains unclear, these findings suggest a potentially modifiable risk factor in lifestyle in high-risk women with a short CL, warranting further investigation through larger prospective studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.