ArticlePregnancy (Hoboken, N.J.)2026
Wearable-based phenotyping of activity patterns during pregnancy.
Article in Pregnancy (Hoboken, N.J.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Objective: Wearable activity trackers provide scalable, objective measures of behavior, but their potential use for early detection of high-risk conditions during pregnancy remains to be evaluated. Study design: Using longitudinal Fitbit data from 336 participants in the Deep Phenotyping of Pregnancy Project (DP3), we evaluated both conventional and novel, pattern-level, digital biomarkers of activity in relation to common pregnancy complications, including hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP), fetal growth restriction (FGR), and spontaneous preterm birth (sPTB). Results: Beyond average weekly step counts, we derived two novel metrics: cyclicality, reflecting the persistence of weekly rhythmic activity patterns, and time-to-drop, the gestational length interval until activity levels declined below group norms. While mean step counts did not differ among the groups, the groups of participants with complications were significantly less likely to exhibit cyclical activity patterns (87.2% vs. 77.6%, Conclusion: These findings suggest that pattern-based digital phenotypes, rather than aggregate step counts, capture activity deviations associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes. Our data support scalable, passive risk stratification and inform precision prenatal care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.