ArticlePregnancy (Hoboken, N.J.)2026
Predicting intrauterine vacuum-induced postpartum hemorrhage-control device treatment success.
Article in Pregnancy (Hoboken, N.J.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04995887 (RUBY), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
RUBY: Treating Abnormal Postpartum Uterine Bleeding or Postpartum Hemorrhage With the Jada® System - A Post-Market Registry
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To identify predictors of postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) treatment success with the JADA intrauterine vacuum-induced hemorrhage-control device in post-market settings. Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study of PPH managed using the JADA system across 16 centers in the United States (NCT04995887). Treatment success was defined as no treatment escalation or PPH recurrence after device placement. Multivariable logistic regression was used to determine significant predictors of PPH treatment success with a stepwise model selection technique. Selection of the best performing model was determined using area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUC) curves, Akaike information criterion (AIC), and data completeness. In exploratory analyses, we assessed differences in treatment success by cause of bleeding and difference in time to device insertion by self-reported race, including an interaction term between race and insertion time. Results: From October 2020 to March 2022, 800 individuals had PPH managed with the JADA device. Most individuals delivered vaginally ( Conclusion: The two most important predictors of treatment success with JADA device were CBL prior to device insertion and the etiology of the bleeding. Understanding these factors may guide PPH treatment algorithms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.