ReviewPregnancy (Hoboken, N.J.)2025
Reevaluating the association between chorioamnionitis and cerebellar hemorrhage: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Review in Pregnancy (Hoboken, N.J.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chorioamnionitis is a recognized risk factor for intraventricular hemorrhage and white matter injury in preterm infants. However, its association with cerebellar hemorrhage (CBH) remains controversial with conflicting evidence in the literature. To clarify this relationship, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis examining the association between chorioamnionitis and CBH. PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library were searched for articles from their inception to December 2024 by two independent reviewers. Studies that compared infants with CBH to those without, while also reporting maternal history of chorioamnionitis, were included in the analysis. Studies without adequate information about the control group were excluded. The Newcastle-Ottawa scale was used to assess the risk of bias in the studies included. A random-effects model was used to calculate the pooled odds ratio and 95% confidence interval. Out of 261 studies screened, 7 studies were included, reaching a total of 1216 infants with 331 with documented chorioamnionitis. Meta-analysis findings demonstrated that chorioamnionitis exposure was significantly associated with an increased risk of CBH (OR 1.71, 95% CI: 1.25-2.35). Notably, prior meta-analyses did not establish a significant link between chorioamnionitis and CBH. Findings suggest that more recent studies may be detecting an association, warranting further investigation into the potential pathophysiological mechanisms and confounding factors influencing this relationship.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.