Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42596978›Full record

ArticlePregnancy (Hoboken, N.J.)2026

Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine Special Statement: Assessment and management of reported penicillin allergy in pregnancy.

Society for Maternal‐Fetal Medicine (SMFM), Jennifer Cate, R Nicholas Burns, Marc Parrish, Alison N Goulding, Nicole A Smith, Samuel T Bauer, Rebecca Hamm, SMFM Patient Safety and Quality Committee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pregnancy (Hoboken, N.J.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Society for Maternal‐Fetal Medicine (SMFM)
Jennifer Cate
R Nicholas Burns
Marc Parrish
Alison N Goulding
Nicole A Smith
Samuel T Bauer
Rebecca Hamm
SMFM Patient Safety and Quality Committee

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Approximately 8% of pregnant people report being allergic to penicillin, yet most of these patients are not truly allergic, either because their allergy has waned or was misdiagnosed in the first place. Penicillin allergy testing can distinguish those who are at risk for reaction to penicillin from those with no or minimal risk. Pregnant patients who report a penicillin allergy may need alternative antibiotics, which are more costly and less effective than first-line antibiotics and are associated with increased maternal risks. Identifying patients who can tolerate penicillin and other β-lactam antibiotics through testing contributes to antibiotic stewardship, improves health outcomes, and saves costs. This Special Statement describes the steps for obstetrical providers to develop a penicillin allergy testing program for pregnant people using a quality improvement framework and multidisciplinary collaboration. It describes in detail how to plan an effective program and provides sample documents that can be modified to support planning, implementation, and evaluation.

Indexed as

allergyanaphylaxisantibiotic stewardshipcost‐effectivenessdelabelingdesensitizationhealthcare costspenicillinpenicillin allergy testing

Identifiers

PMID42596978
PMCPMC13344346

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.