ArticlePregnancy (Hoboken, N.J.)2026
Prenatal remote blood pressure monitoring: Impacts on blood pressure measurement and health outcomes.
Article in Pregnancy (Hoboken, N.J.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Introduction: Remote monitoring technology can help patients and healthcare providers to track blood pressure measurements during pregnancy to manage hypertension, but limited evidence from widespread community use is available. Methods: Among pregnant patients in 2022-2023 with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, in a setting offering home blood pressure monitoring with blood pressure data collected either via weekly nurse telephone calls or digital remote upload of blood pressures with nurse calls only as-needed, we compared participant characteristics, monitoring process, and clinical outcomes between remote monitoring participants and non-remote monitoring participants using propensity weighting to account for differences between participant groups. Results: Among all 2750 pregnant patients with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, 2366 (86.0%) participated in remote monitoring. After adjustment, compared with patients with telephonic nurse monitoring of home-recorded measures, patients with remote monitoring had statistically significantly (all Conclusions: Remote blood pressure monitoring uptake and feasibility was high and was associated with higher capture of clinically actionable values, earlier medication adjustment, improved resource utilization, and similar perinatal outcomes compared with a telephone-based care model for hypertensive disorders of pregnancy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.