ArticlePregnancy (Hoboken, N.J.)2026
Intrapartum glucose metrics associated with adverse neonatal outcomes among people with gestational diabetes mellitus.
Article in Pregnancy (Hoboken, N.J.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Hyperglycemia is a recognized risk factor for adverse neonatal outcomes. However, the impact of achieving glucose goals during labor on the risk of such outcomes remains poorly understood for individuals with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). We sought to compare continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) metrics between laboring GDM pregnancies complicated by adverse neonatal outcomes to those without complications. Methods: Secondary analysis of pregnant people with GDM randomized to using CGM versus capillary blood glucose (CBG) for management of GDM. Among all participants wearing a CGM during labor, we compared pregnancies that were complicated by a significant neonatal outcome as defined by a composite including one or more of the following: hypoglycemia, hyperbilirubinemia, respiratory distress syndrome, or neonatal intensive care unit admission to those without this composite adverse outcome. Continuous variables were compared with two-sample Results: Of the 111 in the primary trial, 59 were included in this secondary analysis. A total of 52 of 111 patients in the primary trial were excluded, as 23 were missing intrapartum data and 29 had no trial of labor prior to cesarean delivery. The cohort with the composite adverse neonatal outcome spent significantly less intrapartum TIR between 70 and 120 mg/dL (62.7% vs. 80.7%, Conclusion: Intrapartum participants with GDM and a composite adverse neonatal outcome spent less TIR, more TAR, with a higher mean glucose in labor than those without a composite adverse outcome. A weak-to-moderate positive correlation between antenatal and intrapartum glucose management was observed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.