Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42596946›Full record

ArticlePregnancy (Hoboken, N.J.)2026

Randomized controlled trial of traxi panniculus retractor use during non-emergent cesarean delivery.

Tooba Anwer, Tina Yi Jin Hsieh, Emily Stonestreet, Audrey Mutoni, Phillip Hess, Yunping Li, Tyler Lueck, Michael Furdyna, John Kowalczyk, Anna Modest and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pregnancy (Hoboken, N.J.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Tooba AnwerDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology Brigham and Women's Hospital Boston Massachusetts USA.
Tina Yi Jin HsiehDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center Boston Massachusetts USA.
Emily StonestreetDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center Boston Massachusetts USA.
Audrey MutoniDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center Boston Massachusetts USA.
Phillip HessHarvard Medical School Boston Massachusetts USA.
Yunping LiHarvard Medical School Boston Massachusetts USA.
Tyler LueckDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center Boston Massachusetts USA.
Michael FurdynaHarvard Medical School Boston Massachusetts USA.
John KowalczykHarvard Medical School Boston Massachusetts USA.
Anna ModestHarvard Medical School Boston Massachusetts USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6543-4078
Ai-Ris Y CollierHarvard Medical School Boston Massachusetts USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8539-3960

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: The objective of our study is to determine whether the use of a self-retaining panniculus retraction device (traxi) in patients with obesity will improve operative time, pulmonary function, or patient and provider experience for non-emergent cesarean delivery. Methods: Pregnant patients with body mass index (BMI) ≥40 kg/m Results: We enrolled 135 participants from 2018 to 2024 at two academic hospitals; 67 were randomized to traxi and 68 were randomized to no traxi. Of these, 43 (31.9%) reported no prior abdominal surgery (including prior cesarean or other laparotomy) and the median BMI was 48.9 (interquartile range [IQR] 45.0, 52.5). The trial was terminated before the target sample size of 220 participants was achieved due to slow accrual and waning clinical equipoise. Baseline characteristics of each group were similar. Median surgical time was 65.0 min (IQR 55.0, 81.0) in the traxi group and 70.0 min (IQR 57.0, 86.0) in the no traxi group, but this difference was not statistically significant ( Conclusions: Traxi panniculus retraction did not significantly improve surgical time but was associated with less restrictive pulmonary function testing compared with the control arm; these findings should be interpreted in the context of the study's limited sample size. There were higher reports of provider satisfaction with use of traxi compared to the control arm. Patient-reported satisfaction with use of traxi was high but not statistically different when compared to the control arm with the exception of patient-reported rash (less in traxi arm).

Indexed as

cesarean deliveryobesitypanniculus retractionsurgical time

Identifiers

PMID42596946
PMCPMC13344226

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.