ArticlePregnancy (Hoboken, N.J.)2026
Using human-centered design to map the perinatal ecosystem for pregnant people with substance use disorders.
Article in Pregnancy (Hoboken, N.J.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Given the profound impacts of substance use in pregnancy on the health and well-being of parents and newborns, improving the organization and delivery of perinatal services for this population is a priority. The objective of this study was to characterize the perinatal ecosystem for pregnant people with substance use disorders (SUDs) and identify operational gaps and opportunities to strengthen care delivery. Methods: We used process mapping, a human-centered design (HCD) methodology, to characterize the steps involved with care delivery across the perinatal care continuum. Clinical and community-based staff within a safety-net healthcare system participated in group and individual process mapping sessions in which they responded to 39 structured questions spanning prenatal through postpartum care. Following an HCD approach to qualitative analysis, we identified themes and generated opportunities. Results: Forty-seven stakeholders participated in process mapping. Analysis revealed three major themes: (1) divergent understandings of policies and procedures among providers, (2) challenges with care coordination, and (3) lack of standardized procedures for engaging Child Protective Services. These themes led to the identification of 13 actionable opportunities to strengthen perinatal care delivery. Conclusions: Process mapping is a valuable methodology for improving systems of care for pregnant people with SUDs. In our ecosystem, process mapping revealed a lack of clear policies and challenges with care coordination. Strengthening healthcare systems is essential to improving consistency, quality, and outcomes for families affected by SUDs in pregnancy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.