ArticlePregnancy (Hoboken, N.J.)2026
Targeted regulation of abortion providers and infant mortality.
Article in Pregnancy (Hoboken, N.J.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Abortion restrictions on pregnant people, such as those that limit gestational age or ban abortion altogether, have been associated with infant mortality, but little is known about whether laws restricting abortion providers and clinics providing abortions have similar associations. This study examines the association between laws that restrict abortion providers, known as TRAP (targeted regulations of abortion providers) laws, and infant mortality on a state level. Methods: This cross-sectional analysis was performed utilizing 2016-2021 Phase 8 data from the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS). PRAMS data were linked with Guttmacher Institute data about state TRAP laws from 2016 to 2021. Infant death rates were calculated using PRAMS data of self-reported infant deaths. Multivariable Poisson regression testing the association between the existence of TRAP laws in a state and infant mortality was performed, adjusting for individual-level sociodemographic factors available in PRAMS. The exposure was defined as the existence of at least one TRAP law in a state during the study period. Results: Among 178,210 participants, representing a weighted population of 9,099,586 birthing people, 47.5% people lived in states ( Conclusions: TRAP laws are associated with a greater likelihood of infant mortality, even after accounting for potential individual-level confounders. Restricted access to abortion may result in people with high-risk maternal or fetal health conditions continuing pregnancy rather than receiving desired abortion services.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.