Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42596806›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of experimental biology2026

Kinematics of gray whale (Eschrichtius robustus) foraging on infaunal ghost shrimp (Neotrypaea californiensis).

Hannah M Clayton, Dave E Cade, James A Fahlbusch, Jessica Kendall-Bar, John Calambokidis, Nicholas D Pyenson, Jeremy A Goldbogen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of experimental biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Hannah M ClaytonOceans Department, Doerr School of Sustainability, Stanford University, CA 94305, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4666-3016
Dave E CadeOceans Department, Doerr School of Sustainability, Stanford University, CA 94305, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3641-1242
James A FahlbuschCascadia Research Collective, 218 1/2 W 4th Ave., Olympia, WA 98501, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9275-013X
Jessica Kendall-BarScripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California San Diego, 8622 Kennel Way, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4758-1386
John CalambokidisCascadia Research Collective, 218 1/2 W 4th Ave., Olympia, WA 98501, USA.
Nicholas D PyensonDepartment of Paleobiology, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC 20560, USA.
Jeremy A GoldbogenOceans Department, Doerr School of Sustainability, Stanford University, CA 94305, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4170-7294

Funding

National Oceanic and Atmospheric AdministrationStanford UniversityWashington Department of Natural Resources
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Emergent technologies and integrative approaches have transformed our ability to understand organismal behavior, physiology and evolutionary ecology. Baleen whales (Mysticeti) have evolved the largest body sizes by filter feeding on dense aggregations of prey in diverse ocean ecosystems. Although the wide range of foraging modes and prey capture abilities among mysticetes has been well documented, the functional morphology underlying these relationships remains poorly understood. Gray whale (Eschrichtius robustus) morphology and ecological niche contrast starkly with those of closely related lunge-feeding rorqual species (Balaenopteridae), with gray whales foraging closer to the coastline using longer skulls and flatter mandibles in comparison to most rorquals. We used video and motion-sensing biologging tags to quantify the kinematics of gray whales feeding on infaunal ghost shrimp (Neotrypaea californiensis) in the shallow waters of the northern Puget Sound, Washington, USA. Tag-based kinematics were integrated with 3D models and morphological dimensions of the skull to calculate the skull area in contact with the seafloor during each feeding roll, resulting in an average minimum benthic contact area of 4.9±1.1 m2. Daily rates of feeding events (mean±s.d. 292±153) were comparable to those of lunge-feeding rorqual species despite using an average of 47.3% (weighted by deployment length) of the available high-tide feeding window. We posit that the paddle-like mandibles of gray whales reflect an adaptation for infaunal prey capture that may facilitate benthic suction filter feeding in shallow coastal habitats, potentially opening a unique coastal foraging niche among mysticetes.

Indexed as

Feeding BehaviorPredatory BehaviorWhalesAnimalsBiomechanical PhenomenaSkullVideo Recording3D modelForagingIntegrativeKinematics

Identifiers

PMID42596806
PMCPMC13615682

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.