Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42596796›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of experimental biology2026

Hoverfly responses to looming stimuli depend on elevation and speed.

Aika H Young, Jaxon Mitchell, Katja Sporar Klinge, Andrew B Barron, Yuri Ogawa, Karin Nordström

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of experimental biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Aika H YoungFlinders Health and Medical Research Institute, Flinders University, GPO Box 2100, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia.ORCID 0009-0000-5028-6164
Jaxon MitchellFlinders Health and Medical Research Institute, Flinders University, GPO Box 2100, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia.ORCID 0009-0007-3952-2219
Katja Sporar KlingeFlinders Health and Medical Research Institute, Flinders University, GPO Box 2100, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia.ORCID 0009-0004-7224-6568
Andrew B BarronSchool of Natural Sciences, Macquarie University, Balaclava Rd, Macquarie Park, Sydney, NSW 2113, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-8135-6628
Yuri OgawaFlinders Health and Medical Research Institute, Flinders University, GPO Box 2100, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-9708-7063
Karin NordströmFlinders Health and Medical Research Institute, Flinders University, GPO Box 2100, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6020-6348

Funding

Australian Research Council DP230100006Australian Research Council DP250100698Flinders UniversityUS Air Force Office of Scientific Research FA9550-23-1-0473
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An object on immediate collision course generates a rapidly expanding visual stimulus on the retina, which will typically trigger a fast reaction, such as an evasive behaviour. In hoverflies, for example, visual looming stimuli may be generated if the insect is about to collide with a stationary object in the surround, by an approaching predator, or by conspecifics during territorial interactions. Supporting these behavioural responses is a diverse range of looming-sensitive descending neurons that project information from the optic lobes and central brain to the motor control centres in the thoracic ganglia. We show here that these neurons are predominantly sensitive to looming stimuli located in the ventral visual field. To investigate if this is matched by behaviour, we recorded how tethered hoverflies responded to looming stimuli presented dorsally or ventrally on a visual monitor, at four different speeds (l⧸|v| of 10-667 ms), covering a naturalistic range. We found that ventral stimuli, especially at intermediate speeds (l⧸|v|=50 or 200 ms), triggered much stronger behavioural responses than dorsally displayed stimuli. The behavioural data thus not only match the receptive fields of the neurons likely to support the behaviour but also highlight that behavioural output is not entirely reflexive but is strongly modulated by stimulus speed and elevation.

Indexed as

DipteraMotion PerceptionAnimalsNeuronsPhotic StimulationVisual FieldsDescending neuronElectrophysiologyEristalis tenaxLooming stimulusMotion visionTethered flight

Identifiers

PMID42596796
PMCPMC13615673

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.