Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42596789›Full record

ReviewGlobal change biology2026

Multi-Model Ensembles in Ecosystem Modeling: Challenges and Best Practices for Decision-Making.

Kaiyu Guan, Rongzhu Qin, Zewei Ma, Lei Zhao, Licheng Liu, Sheng Wang, Trevor F Keenan, Mengqi Jia, Debjani Sihi, Eric Potash and 12 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Global change biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

Kaiyu GuanAgroecosystem Sustainability Center, Institute for Sustainability, Energy, and Environment, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3499-6382
Rongzhu QinAgroecosystem Sustainability Center, Institute for Sustainability, Energy, and Environment, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois, USA.
Zewei MaAgroecosystem Sustainability Center, Institute for Sustainability, Energy, and Environment, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois, USA.
Lei ZhaoNational Center for Supercomputing Applications, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois, USA.
Licheng LiuCollege of Agricultural and Life Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9649-1056
Sheng WangAgroecosystem Sustainability Center, Institute for Sustainability, Energy, and Environment, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois, USA.
Trevor F KeenanClimate and Ecosystem Sciences Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3347-0258
Mengqi JiaAgroecosystem Sustainability Center, Institute for Sustainability, Energy, and Environment, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2824-4747
Debjani SihiDepartment of Plant and Microbial Biology, N.C. Plant Sciences Initiative, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5513-8862
Eric PotashAgroecosystem Sustainability Center, Institute for Sustainability, Energy, and Environment, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4658-9802
Senthold AssengDepartment of Life Science Engineering, Digital Agriculture, HEF World Agricultural Systems Center, Technical University of Munich, Freising, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7583-3811
Jingyun TangMolecular Ecology and Biogeochemistry Department, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4792-1259
Xiangtao XuDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA.
Katheleen BoomerFoundation for Food and Agricultural Research, Washington, DC, USA.
Bin PengAgroecosystem Sustainability Center, Institute for Sustainability, Energy, and Environment, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois, USA.
Zhenong JinDepartment of Bioproducts and Biosystems Engineering, University of Minnesota-Twin Cities, Saint Paul, Minnesota, USA.
Forrest M HoffmanIntegrated Computational Earth Sciences Group, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, USA.
Stephen OgleDepartment of Ecosystem Science and Sustainability, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1899-7446
Jonathan CoppessDepartment of Agricultural & Consumer Economics, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois, USA.
Madhu KhannaDOE Center for Advanced Bioenergy and Bioproducts Innovation, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4994-4451
Alyssa WhitcraftNASA Acres Consortium, Washington, DC, USA.
Benjamin R K RunkleDepartment of Biological and Agricultural Engineering, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, Arkansas, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2583-1199

Funding

Department of Energy AWARD NUMBER DE‐AC05‐00OR22725Department of Energy AWARD NUMBER DE‐SC0025314Department of Energy DE‐SC0021023NASA 80NSSC21K1002NASA 80NSSC21K1705 AND 80NSSC25K7327National Science Foundation DEB‐2517620
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ecosystem models are increasingly central to the decision-making for environmental policy, conservation planning, and climate-related investments. Yet, the growing reliance on Multi-Model Ensembles (MMEs) of ecosystem models by practitioners and policymakers, sometimes under tight timelines and imperfect information, has frequently outpaced the scientific rigor required to ensure ensemble reliability. Here, MMEs refer to approaches that combine targeted predictions from multiple models with the expectation of improving robustness and quantifying predictive uncertainty. Poorly designed MMEs may create a false sense of confidence and lead to suboptimal policy and market decisions. This perspective argues that robust decision-making-relevant MMEs must be grounded on two pillars: (1) rigorous Model Intercomparison Projects (MIPs), which identify inter-model agreement and disagreement, characterize model uncertainties, and evaluate robustness with observationally based benchmarks-MIPs' diagnostic evaluation is so critical that it must be needed to drive MME's decision in model selection and weighting, especially when only a limited number of models available; and (2) co-design by both stakeholders and scientists to ensure that scenarios, metrics and uncertainty requirements provide decision-relevant information. Building upon the past success and lessons from the existing MIPs-MMEs efforts (e.g., climate/Earth system/crop), we derived the theoretical basis for MMEs, addressed their specific challenges in ecosystem modeling, and highlighted proper consideration of model numbers and diversity, risk of model inter-dependence, effective calibration of model parameters, possible overdue of some ecosystem model development, critical roles of open benchmark data across a wide range of conditions, and suggested use of Artificial Intelligence to support MIPs-MMEs. We highlighted the under-recognized opportunity for MIPs and MMEs to drive scientific progress and innovation through identifying better performing models, systematic benchmarking, feedback loops, and targeted model improvement. By following actionable best practice guidelines, MMEs can evolve from ad hoc aggregation of models into a trusted backbone of environmental policy and decision-making.

Indexed as

Conservation of Natural ResourcesDecision MakingEcosystemModels, TheoreticalUncertaintyecosystem modelingmodel developmentmodel evaluationmodel intercomparison projectsmodel uncertaintymulti‐model ensembles

Identifiers

PMID42596789
PMCPMC13473990

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.