ArticleCancer research2026
KRASG12V Degraders Provide a Potential Therapeutic Opportunity in Lung Adenocarcinoma.
Article in Cancer research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mutant KRAS inhibition has revolutionized the treatment of lung adenocarcinoma. Unfortunately, responses to this form of targeted therapy are often of limited duration because of the development of resistance. Targeted protein degradation, including using PROTACs (PROteolysis-TArgeting Chimeras), presents an alternative approach to targeting oncogenic drivers in cancer. In this issue of Cancer Research, Martín and colleagues developed a dTAG-KRASG12V syngeneic mouse model that allows for the study of the effects of degrading the KRASG12V oncoprotein in vivo. The authors discovered that degrading the KRASG12V oncoprotein leads to regression of the resulting lung adenocarcinoma tumors. Most of the regression was based on cancer cell-intrinsic responses, although the tumor microenvironment also underwent substantial remodeling. Despite the initial efficacy of the treatment, the authors found that prolonged PROTAC KRAS degrader treatment eventually resulted in relapse. Resistance to PROTAC treatment seemed to be driven by dysregulation of the ubiquitin-proteasome system that is required for the activity of the PROTAC degraders. Despite developing resistance to the PROTAC degraders, the resulting tumors were still dependent on the KRAS oncoprotein, meaning that they were still sensitive to conventional KRAS inhibitors. Thus, PROTACs that degrade the KRAS oncoprotein are a promising modality for the treatment of lung adenocarcinomas. Resistance to PROTACs may differ from conventional KRAS inhibitors, suggesting potential strategies for overcoming such resistance. See related article by Martín et al., p. 4115.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42596691What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.