ReviewAdvanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.)2026
Interfacial Failure and Self-Healing in Solid-State Batteries.
Review in Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Solid-state batteries hold great promise for simultaneously improving energy density and intrinsic safety. However, their practical application is severely impeded by interfacial instabilities arising from coupled mechanical, chemical, and electrochemical degradation during cycling, ultimately resulting in rapid performance decay. Although conventional strategies, such as interfacial coatings or electrode structural optimization, have partially improved electrochemical performance, their inherently static nature renders them ill-equipped to adapt to the continuous and dynamic evolution of interfacial damage during long-term operation. To address these persistent challenges, dynamic interfacial self-healing has emerged as a compelling strategy for developing highly durable and stable solid-state batteries. In this review, we first discuss the origins and evolution of mechanical, chemical, and electrochemical failures at the interface, highlighting their intricate interplay. Recent progress in self-healing strategies, including physical flow, chemical restoration, external stimuli, and electric fields was subsequently analyzed to solve specific interfacial failure behavior. Perspectives on the emerging strategies and key challenges for achieving high self-healing efficiency were provided in the end. The development of self-healing mechanisms presents a highly viable route toward the realization of robust, low-pressure solid-state batteries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42596639What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.