ArticleClinical pharmacology and therapeutics2026
Population Pharmacokinetics and Exposure-Response Analyses to Support Cofetuzumab Pelidotin (ABBV-647) Dose Optimization in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients.
Article in Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cofetuzumab pelidotin (Cofe-P) is an anti-protein tyrosine kinase 7 (PTK7) antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) being investigated for the treatment of adults with PTK7-expressing, recurrent non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The first-in-human (FIH) trial demonstrated tolerability of dosages ≤ 2.8 mg/kg once every 3 weeks (Q3W) and ≤ 3.2 mg/kg Q2W. Population pharmacokinetics (popPK) and exposure-response analyses were conducted to characterize Cofe-P and unconjugated auristatin (Aur0101) payload pharmacokinetics and exposure-efficacy (objective response rate (ORR)) and exposure-safety (Grade ≥ 3 neutropenia, Grade ≥ 2 peripheral neuropathy or rash) endpoints to inform the selection of dosages for optimization. Data from the FIH (0.2-3.7 mg/kg Q3W, 2.1-3.2 mg/kg Q2W) and Phase 1b (2.8 mg/kg Q3W) studies were used for popPK and exposure-response analyses. PopPK models adequately described pharmacokinetic data. Exposure-response analyses showed that higher Cofe-P (ADC) exposures increased the probability of achieving an objective response but also the occurrence of examined adverse events, particularly Grade ≥ 3 neutropenia. In non-squamous epidermal growth factor receptor wild-type NSCLC patients (≥ 90% with PTK7 2+ staining), analyses predicted that 3.2 mg/kg vs. 2.8 mg/kg Q3W dosing led to a higher ORR (35% vs. 21%) while maintaining a manageable safety profile (Grade ≥ 3 neutropenia: ≤ 39%). Predicted ORR and Grade ≥ 3 neutropenia are improvements over the standard-of-care, docetaxel. Dosing regimens < 2.4 mg/kg were not predicted to improve efficacy. Mean relative dose intensity was ≥ 86% across all Cofe-P doses and schedules tested. Together, popPK and exposure-response analyses support optimal dosing regimens of 2.4, 2.8, and 3.2 mg/kg Cofe-P Q3W in patients with NSCLC.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.