ArticleBiophysical journal2026
Fusion dynamics of viscoelastic droplets: Similarities and differences with shape recovery.
Article in Biophysical journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Biomolecular condensates formed by phase separation inside cells often exhibit viscoelastic behavior, yet their shape recovery and fusion dynamics are frequently interpreted using purely viscous models. Here, we develop a unified theoretical and computational framework to quantify how viscoelasticity governs these two fundamental processes. We combine analytical theory for small-deformation shape recovery with axisymmetric finite-element simulations based on the Oldroyd-B constitutive model to systematically investigate both shape recovery and droplet fusion under comparable physical conditions. Our results show that, although both processes are driven by capillary forces, they are distinct in their underlying physics. Shape recovery is governed by global viscocapillary relaxation of a single connected interface and follows single- or multi-exponential decay depending on the relative magnitude of the viscocapillary timescale and the stress relaxation time. In contrast, droplet fusion is intrinsically a multi-stage process involving localized curvature-driven neck formation, rapid bridge expansion, and a transition to global relaxation. We demonstrate that viscoelasticity introduces an additional intrinsic timescale that governs the competition between capillary driving and stress relaxation, characterized by the Deborah number. This leads to enhanced intermediate-stage fusion dynamics and modified relaxation behavior compared to Newtonian droplets. Furthermore, we show that the presence of an exterior fluid with finite viscosity introduces additional hydrodynamic dissipation through two-phase coupling, significantly slowing the fusion process. Finally, we compare the computationally predicted droplet fusion in the Newtonian and viscoelastic cases with a stretched-exponential empirical formula. Deviations observed in viscoelastic regimes highlight the limitations of purely viscous descriptions and the need for models incorporating stress relaxation and memory effects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.