Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42596073›Full record

ArticleBJU international2026

Immediate intraoperative detrusor muscle status at primary transurethral resection of bladder tumour: a prospective, blinded, paired cohort, feasibility study using fluorescence confocal microscopy (IB1-LaserComplete study).

Martin J Connor, Archana Gopalakrishnan, Nikhil Mayor, Eva Bolton, Sami Hamid, Sai Kalpitha Reddy, Tayla Perreau, Eslam Maher, Alexander Light, Samuel Morris and 11 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BJU international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Martin J ConnorDivision of Surgery, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4033-7508
Archana GopalakrishnanDivision of Surgery, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Nikhil MayorDivision of Surgery, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Eva BoltonDepartment of Urology, Charing Cross Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK.
Sami HamidDepartment of Urology, Charing Cross Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK.
Sai Kalpitha ReddyDepartment of Urology, Charing Cross Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK.ORCID 0009-0006-4013-8444
Tayla PerreauDivision of Surgery, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Eslam MaherExperimental Cancer Medicine Centre (ECMC), Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5428-1555
Alexander LightDivision of Surgery, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7246-3651
Samuel MorrisDivision of Surgery, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Jiten JaipuraDepartment of Urology, Charing Cross Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK.
Mariana Bertoncelli TanakaDepartment of Urology, Charing Cross Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4130-6519
Norma GibbonsDepartment of Urology, Charing Cross Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK.
Archie Hughes-HallettDepartment of Urology, Charing Cross Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1595-1805
Hashim U AhmedDivision of Surgery, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1674-6723
Rakesh HeerDivision of Surgery, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Andrew SmithDepartment of Histopathology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Charing Cross Hospital, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0352-4849
David HroudaDepartment of Urology, Charing Cross Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK.
Anna SilvantoDepartment of Histopathology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (UCLH), London, UK.
Mona El-BahrawyDepartment of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Mathias WinklerDivision of Surgery, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2553-5816

Funding

Urology Foundation WSSY.NEP032
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo evaluate ex vivo fluorescence confocal microscopy (FCM) for immediate detrusor muscle (DM) assessment during primary transurethral resection of bladder tumour (TURBT). PATIENTS AND

methodsThis prospective, blinded, paired-cohort feasibility study enrolled consecutive patients undergoing primary TURBT for suspected non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer between September 2024 and September 2025 (IB1-LaserComplete study; International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Number Register [ISRCTN]16114765). Ex vivo FCM generates immediate high-resolution digital images of fresh tissue, enabling immediate DM assessment. Intraoperative ex vivo FCM imaging of en face tumour base specimens was performed using the Histolog® scanner (SamanTree Medical SA, Lausanne, Switzerland). DM status was reported by a blinded uro-pathologist and urologist. Formalin-fixed histopathology served as the reference standard. The primary outcome was technical feasibility, defined as acquisition of an interpretable FCM image. Secondary outcomes included exploratory diagnostic performance, inter-observer agreement and time to confirmation of DM status.

resultsA total of 34 patients were recruited and 30 had evaluable paired specimens. DM was absent in 13% (four of 30). FCM was sufficient for determining DM status in all patients (100%; 30 of 30). Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value (NPV) were 42% (95% confidence interval [CI] 26-61%), 100% (95% CI 51-100%), 100% (95% CI 74-100%), and 21% (95% CI 9-43%), respectively. Inter-observer agreement between the uro-pathologist and urologist was high at 83% (κ = 0.72, 95% CI 0.47-0.97). The median (interquartile range) time to confirm DM status was 5.4 (4.95-5.39) min vs 11 (7-13.8) days using standard histopathology.

conclusionFluorescence confocal microscopy is feasible for rapid intraoperative imaging of TURBT specimens and demonstrates excellent specificity for detection of DM. However, its low sensitivity and NPV preclude use as a stand-alone tool to exclude DM intraoperatively. Based on these findings, FCM should not guide intraoperative decision making outside research settings.

Indexed as

Muscle, SmoothUrinary BladderUrinary Bladder NeoplasmsAgedAged, 80 and overFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMicroscopy, ConfocalMicroscopy, FluorescenceMiddle AgedNon-Muscle Invasive Bladder NeoplasmsProspective StudiesTransurethral Resection of Bladderbladder cancerdetrusor musclefluorescence confocal microscopy (FCM)intraoperative pathologytransurethral resection of bladder tumour

Identifiers

PMID42596073
PMCPMC13550801

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.