ArticleAnnals of clinical and translational neurology2026
Anti-CD20 Discontinuation Versus Continuation in People Aged Over 50 With Non-Active Multiple Sclerosis.
Article in Annals of clinical and translational neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
41 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo determine whether discontinuing anti-CD20 therapy in people with relapsing-onset MS aged over 50 is associated with an increased risk of relapse, inflammatory activity, confirmed disability accrual, and serious infection compared with continuing therapy.
methodsThis observational, multicenter, retrospective cohort study included 2283 patients from the French MS registry aged > 50, who had received at least two cycles of anti-CD20 and had experienced no relapses or MRI activity for at least one year prior to inclusion. Patients were classified as discontinuing or continuing therapy and 1:1 matched using a time-dependent propensity score. Outcomes were time to first relapse, inflammatory activity (relapse and/or MRI activity), confirmed disability accrual, and serious infection.
resultsAmong 1900 patients continuing therapy and 383 discontinuing, 224 in each group were matched (mean age = 57.7 ± 5.9 years; mean EDSS = 5.4 ± 1.7; median follow-up after matching = 34.8 [21.6-50.4] months). There were no significant differences between groups in time to first relapse (HR = 0.6, 95% CI 0.3-1.3, p = 0.2), inflammatory activity (HR = 0.9, 95% CI 0.5-1.4, p = 0.6), confirmed disability accrual (HR = 1.2, 95% CI 0.9-1.7, p = 0.2), and serious infections (HR = 1.0, 95% CI 0.6-1.8, p = 0.9).
interpretationThis retrospective study found no evidence of differences between stopping and continuing anti-CD20 therapy regarding relapse, inflammatory activity, disability accrual, or serious infections in older patients with long-standing non-active MS over a median 2.9-year follow-up.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.