ArticleBMC public health2026
Retrospective narratives of COVID-19 experiences: a qualitative study of written accounts by people in public in the context of a performative intervention.
Article in BMC public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis qualitative study explored how people retrospectively described their experiences of the COVID-19 pandemic. It aimed how these experiences are remembered and interpreted over time.
methodsA qualitative study design was employed, based on short texts written by members of the public during a performative intervention in public space. The texts were thematically analyzed to identify common experiences and emotions.
resultsThe findings show that participants described the pandemic not only as a health crisis but also as a major social and emotional challenge. Feelings of fear, uncertainty, and loss of control were common, alongside attempts to find meaning and emotional stability. Narratives also suggest that the ability to reflect on the pandemic as a period of adaptation or personal growth depended on access to stable resources such as housing, social support, and digital connectivity.
conclusionsOverall, the study highlights that how the pandemic is remembered is closely linked to social conditions, underlining the importance of inclusive and reflective approaches to understanding the long-term impacts of COVID-19. In addition, it demonstrates that social inequalities in both the interpretation of past crises and the development of inclusive strategies are important for future public health response.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.