ArticleInternational journal of behavioral medicine2026
Examining the Potential of Person-centered Temporal Network Models to Individualize Type 1 Diabetes Care.
Article in International journal of behavioral medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeWe aimed to characterize dynamic, individualized relationships among glucose, physical symptoms, emotions, and functioning (e.g., experiential variables) in adults with type 1 diabetes (T1D) using person-centered temporal network models, and assess whether network features relate to retrospective well-being and functioning.
methodsWe analyzed data from 158 adults with T1D who completed 14 days of blinded continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) and ecological momentary assessments of experiential variables. For each participant, we estimated a temporal network using the Group Iterative Multiple Model Estimation (GIMME) algorithm, which quantifies dynamic interconnections of variables within individuals. We assessed the variability of models across participants, and examined whether interconnections among variables (network density) were associated with retrospective measures of well-being and functioning.
resultsGIMME models converged for 96.3% of participants, and showed excellent model fit for 77.2% of participants, establishing feasibility. Individual networks had a median of 20.5 (IQR 16-32.75) connections, of which 5 (IQR 3-8) were between glucose and experiential variables. Networks showed marked heterogeneity in the presence, direction, and strength of associations between variables. Individuals whose glucose was strongly predicted by experiential variables (i.e., those whose networks had higher "glucose-in" density), experienced greater depressive symptoms (β = 0.17, p = 0.03), perceived stress (β = 0.24, p < 0.001), anxiety symptoms (β = 0.19, p = 0.02), and negative affect (β = 0.16, p = 0.05) and poorer lifestyle/occupational balance (β = -0.16, p = 0.04).
conclusionsGIMME models identify individualized patterns linking glucose with daily experiences, which may help generate hypotheses relevant to tailoring care. Network features are associated with retrospective measures of well-being and functioning, supporting the potential of network-informed approaches to T1D care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42595947What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.