Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42595944›Full record

ArticleAnnals of surgical oncology2026

ASO Editorial: Lymph Node Dissection in the Immunotherapy Era: Friend or Foe?

Adom Bondzi-Simpson, Christopher W Seder, Elliot Wakeam

Abstract readEditorial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of surgical oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Adom Bondzi-SimpsonDivision of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Toronto General Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada. adom.bondzisimpson@mail.utoronto.ca.
Christopher W SederDepartment of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA.
Elliot WakeamDivision of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The emergence of immunotherapy has transformed the management of resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and renewed interest in the relationship between surgery and antitumor immunity. Among the questions raised by this therapeutic evolution is whether lymph node dissection, a longstanding component of oncologic resection and pathologic staging, may influence the effectiveness of immune checkpoint inhibition through disruption of tumor-draining lymph node networks that are critical for antigen presentation and T cell priming. This question lies at the intersection of two enduring principles in thoracic oncology: the importance of high-quality nodal assessment and the growing recognition that lymphoid structures play a central role in mediating immune response to cancer therapies. As mechanistic understanding of tumor immunology continues to evolve, hypotheses have emerged suggesting that operative decisions may influence subsequent treatment efficacy. In this perspective, the authors examine the historical debate surrounding the extent of lymph node assessment in NSCLC, discuss emerging immunotherapy-era considerations, and explore the challenges of translating mechanistic observations into clinical practice. They argue that biologic plausibility, although fundamental, must ultimately be interpreted alongside clinical and epidemiologic evidence to guide contemporary surgical decision-making.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungImmunotherapyLung NeoplasmsLymph Node ExcisionHumansLymph NodesChemoimmunotherapyImmune checkpoint inhibitorsImmunotherapyLymphadenectomyLymph node dissectionNodal stagingNon-small cell lung cancerSurgical oncologyThoracic surgery

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.