ArticleEuropean radiology2026
ΔAverage of long and short axis diameter on non-contrast CT is associated with major pathological response to neoadjuvant immunotherapy in resectable non-small cell lung cancer.
Article in European radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveNeoadjuvant immunotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer shows heterogeneous efficacy, and Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1) fails to accurately predict pathological response. The objective was to explore computed tomography parameters associated with neoadjuvant immunotherapy efficacy and compare their performance with RECIST 1.1. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis multicenter retrospective study included 48 patients with resectable stage I-IIIB non-small cell lung cancer who received neoadjuvant immunotherapy between September 2018 and July 2023. Computed tomography density parameters (computed tomography value and relative computed tomography value) and morphological characteristics (mean diameter, volume, surface area) were measured before and after treatment. Major pathological response (≤ 10% residual tumor cells) served as the reference standard. Receiver operating characteristic analysis and logistic regression evaluated parameter performance.
resultsΔMean diameter demonstrated the highest predictive accuracy for major pathological response (area under the curve 0.83, p < 0.001), with 76% sensitivity, 84% specificity, and 79.2% overall accuracy, with numerically higher accuracy than Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 (72.9%), though no formal statistical test for superiority was conducted. In exploratory multivariable analysis, it was the only parameter retaining independent association with major pathological response (odds ratio 11.91, 95% confidence interval 1.52-93.11, p = 0.018).
conclusionΔMean diameter is a promising imaging biomarker for predicting pathological response to neoadjuvant immunotherapy. In this cohort, it showed numerically higher accuracy than RECIST 1.1; however, these findings are hypothesis-generating and require both internal and external validation before clinical implementation. KEY POINTS: Question Neoadjuvant immunotherapy for resectable non-small cell lung cancer shows heterogeneous efficacy, and RECIST 1.1 fails to predict major pathological response, requiring reliable biomarkers. Findings ΔMean diameter was associated with major pathological response (AUC = 0.83), showed numerically higher accuracy than RECIST 1.1, and represented an exploratory independent predictor. Clinical relevance This simple computed tomography parameter shows promise for identifying treatment efficacy in non-complete responders, aids personalized therapy decisions, and improves the accuracy of immunotherapy evaluation without complex radiomics or costly positron emission tomography.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42595861What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.