ReviewEuropean journal of pediatrics2026
Is watchful waiting an alternative to adenotonsillectomy in children with mild to moderate obstructive sleep apnoea?
Review in European journal of pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Adenotonsillectomy (ATE) has traditionally been the first-line treatment for obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) in children. Increasing evidence suggests that many children with mild to moderate OSA may improve without surgery. This mini-review examines whether watchful waiting is a safe and effective alternative to ATE in otherwise healthy children with mild to moderate OSA. We searched PubMed from inception to January 2026 for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing ATE with watchful waiting in children aged 1-16 years with OSA or sleep-disordered breathing confirmed by polysomnography or a validated symptom score. Two reviewers independently screened and extracted data. Results were analysed qualitatively. Five RCTs (seven published reports; n = 1287 children; mean age 6.1 years) met inclusion criteria. Spontaneous OSA resolution occurred in 44-55% of children managed with watchful waiting, compared with 57-79% following ATE. ATE produced statistically greater reductions in the apnoea-hypopnoea index in four of five trials, but between-group differences were modest. The largest and most consistent effects of ATE were seen for OSA symptom scores.
conclusionWatchful waiting is a reasonable option for young, nonobese children with mild OSA, given the relatively high rates of spontaneous resolution. ATE remains appropriate for children with moderate to severe OSA. Shared decision-making, individualised care and close follow-up are essential when watchful waiting is chosen. WHAT IS KNOWN: • Otherwise healthy children with obstructive sleep apnoea due to adenotonsillar hyperplasia are usually managed with adenotonsillectomy. • Young, non-obese, Caucasian children with more mild obstructive sleep apnoea, however, showed a surprisingly high probability of spontaneous resolution of the disease in one study. WHAT IS NEW: • High rates of spontaneous resolution of obstructive sleep apnoea were observed in four independent studies, ranging from 44% to 55%. • Watchful waiting for several months may, thus, be a reasonable management option in a particular low-risk group of children with obstructive sleep apnoea.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.