ArticleWiener klinische Wochenschrift2026
Examining patient-centered vs. doctor-centered attitudes among Austrian general practitioners : A cross-sectional study on time constraints and care orientation.
Article in Wiener klinische Wochenschrift, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo investigate the relationship between patient load or time constraints and attitudes towards person-centered care vs. doctor or disease-centered care within the context of primary care and family medicine in Austria.
methodsA cross-sectional questionnaire-based study was conducted in Austria as part of the international Person-centered care Attitudes among European General Practitioners/Family Physicians (PACE GP/FP) study [1]. The primary analysis examined the association between continuous patient-practitioner orientation scale (PPOS) scores and self-reported patient load using multivariable linear regression adjusted for age, sex and perceived stress. For a secondary analysis, participants were assigned to one of three care-approach groups, based on PPOS scores (patient-centered, medium patient-centered and doctor/disease-centered) and compared regarding the self-reported number of patients seen per day using a Kruskal-Wallis test.
resultsIn multivariable linear regression analyses, higher patient load remained independently associated with lower continuous PPOS scores (B = -0.003, 95% CI -0.005 to -0.001, p = 0.002). In our sample, patient load differed significantly across the different care approaches, H(2) = 6.112, p = 0.047, η
conclusionHigher patient load was associated with a lower patient-centered orientation among Austrian general practitioners. Our findings suggest the need to address systematic factors contributing to time constraints and emphasize the importance of equipping general practitioners with the resources needed to integrate person-centered care into their practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42595839What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.