Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42595838›Full record

ArticlePsychonomic bulletin & review2026

Hearing singular "they" primes both "they" and "he/she".

Gabrielle Wells Garner, Jennifer E Arnold

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Psychonomic bulletin & review, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Gabrielle Wells GarnerDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of North Carolina, Campus Box 3270, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA.
Jennifer E ArnoldDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of North Carolina, Campus Box 3270, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA. jarnold@email.unc.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The English language has recently expanded its pronoun system to include the use of singular they when referring to a person whose pronouns are they/them. What cognitive mechanism accounts for increasing fluency in the use of this form? We examine whether hearing someone use singular they increases the rate and accuracy of using this form through a priming mechanism, despite prior failures to find such an effect. We show that it does for both college students (Experiment 1) and a community sample of adults (aged 30-70 years). We further ask what linguistic representations are activated with priming from singular they. Priming from hearing they increased the use of both singular they and he and she, suggesting activation of the class of third-person pronouns. But it had a stronger priming effect on they and also reduced errors for singular they, suggesting that it also specifically activates representations related to singular they.

Indexed as

LanguageAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrimingPronoun productionSingular they

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.