Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42595756›Full record

ArticleNature communications2026

Phylogenetic reconciliation supports a methanogenic ancestor of the Archaea and a derived origin for host-associated lineages.

Wen-Cong Huang, Nina Dombrowski, Tara A Mahendrarajah, Noah Wahl, Alexandros Stamatakis, Gergely J Szöllősi, Tom A Williams, Anja Spang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Wen-Cong HuangDepartment of Marine Microbiology and Biogeochemistry, Royal Netherlands Institute for Sea Research (NIOZ), Den Burg, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1328-4087
Nina DombrowskiDepartment of Marine Microbiology and Biogeochemistry, Royal Netherlands Institute for Sea Research (NIOZ), Den Burg, The Netherlands.
Tara A MahendrarajahDepartment of Marine Microbiology and Biogeochemistry, Royal Netherlands Institute for Sea Research (NIOZ), Den Burg, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7032-6581
Noah WahlBiodiversity Computing Group, Institute of Computer Science, Foundation for Research and Technology Hellas, Heraklion, Greece.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-7628-6557
Alexandros StamatakisBiodiversity Computing Group, Institute of Computer Science, Foundation for Research and Technology Hellas, Heraklion, Greece.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0353-0691
Gergely J SzöllősiInstitute of Evolution, HUN-REN Center for Ecological Research, Budapest, Hungary. gergely.szollosi@oist.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8556-845X
Tom A WilliamsCentre for Evolution, Department of Life Sciences, University of Bath, Bath, UK. tw2316@bath.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1072-0223
Anja SpangDepartment of Marine Microbiology and Biogeochemistry, Royal Netherlands Institute for Sea Research (NIOZ), Den Burg, The Netherlands. anja.spang@nioz.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6518-8556

Funding

EC | EU Framework Programme for Research and Innovation H2020 | H2020 Priority Excellent Science | H2020 European Research Council (H2020 Excellent Science - European Research Council) No. 714774EC | EU Framework Programme for Research and Innovation H2020 | H2020 Priority Excellent Science | H2020 European Research Council (H2020 Excellent Science - European Research Council) No. 947317, ASymbELJohn Templeton Foundation (JTF) 63451
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The phylogeny of the Archaea continues to be revisited and revised as new groups are discovered and phylogenetic methods improve, but key questions about their early evolution remain unanswered. It has been suggested that the root of the Archaea may lie on, or potentially within, any of three major groups - the Euryarchaeota, TACK+Asgard clade, and DPANN, the last of which includes many host-associated and genome-reduced lineages. These root hypotheses make starkly different predictions about the nature of early archaeal evolution: for example, a root on or within DPANN might suggest a small-genome and host-associated ancestor, with methanogenesis, the hallmark metabolism of the Archaea, evolving later. Here, we investigate the position of the archaeal root and the nature of the last archaeal common ancestor using a range of phylogenetic approaches, including the best available site- and branch-heterogeneous substitution models, and new gene tree-species tree reconciliation models that capture changes in rates of gene duplication, loss and transfer across the phylogeny. Our analyses converge on a narrow archaeal root region at or near the base of the Euryarchaeota, supporting hypotheses in which the Last Archaeal Common Ancestor (LACA) was a complex, free-living (hyper-)thermophilic methanogen. We recover DPANN as the sister group to TACK and Asgard archaea, and suggest that their genome evolution has been characterised by episodes of genome streamlining and expansion, driven by gene loss and transfer.

Indexed as

ArchaeaMethanePhylogenyEuryarchaeotaEvolution, MolecularGenome, ArchaealMethane

Identifiers

PMID42595756
PMCPMC13473441

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.