ArticleEpilepsia open2026
Impact of vigabatrin on risk of relapse of infantile spasms.
Article in Epilepsia open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveVigabatrin is an effective treatment for infantile epileptic spasms syndrome (IESS), but relapse remains a clinical challenge. The ideal dose and duration of treatment after response are unknown. We set out to identify treatment-related predictors of IESS relapse after initial vigabatrin response.
methodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study of infants with IESS who achieved electroclinical response within 30 days of vigabatrin initiation (alone or with hormonal therapy) and remained in remission for ≥ 30 days. Time to epileptic spasms relapse was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier procedure and Cox proportional hazards regression. A linear regression-based propensity score (derived from etiology and latency to vigabatrin initiation) was included in Cox models to adjust for treatment duration confounding. Candidate predictors included age at IESS onset, presence of other seizure types at onset, developmental status, prior relapse, vigabatrin dose, and use of dual therapy (concomitant adrenocorticotropic hormone [ACTH] or prednisolone).
resultsOf 164 responders, 63 (38%) relapsed at a median of 7.5 months (IQR: 2.4-18.0) after response. Twenty-one (33.3%) relapses occurred following vigabatrin discontinuation. In propensity score-adjusted multivariable regression, increased relapse risk was associated with prior IESS relapse (HR 2.35; 95% CI 1.24-4.45; P = 0.009), other seizure types at IESS onset (HR 2.31; 95% CI 1.31-4.07; P = 0.004), and abnormal development at IESS diagnosis (HR 1.75; 95% CI 1.04-2.95; P = 0.035). Moderate dosing (100-149 mg/kg/day) was protective versus lower doses (HR 0.47; 95% CI 0.25-0.89; P = 0.020). In an underpowered analysis of vigabatrin exposure as a time-varying covariate, ongoing therapy was not significantly associated with latency to relapse (HR 0.77; 95% CI 0.39-1.49; P = 0.436). SIGNIFICANCE: Relapse after vigabatrin response is common and influenced by identifiable clinical factors. Continued vigabatrin treatment (> 100 mg/kg/day) may reduce relapse risk. Prospective validation is warranted to guide individualized relapse prevention strategies. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: Infantile Epileptic Spasms Syndrome is a serious seizure disorder of infancy that can recur even after successful treatment with vigabatrin. In this study of 164 infants, we found that relapse was most common among children with prior relapses, other seizure types, or developmental delays. Infants treated with moderate vigabatrin doses (100-149 mg/kg/day) had the lowest relapse rates. These findings may help clinicians identify which infants face the highest risk and tailor treatment accordingly.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.