ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2026
Stage-Dependent Effects of "Too Little and Too Much" Medial Prefrontal Activity on Reversal Learning in Rats: Functional Inhibition Impairs Early, Whereas Neural Disinhibition Impairs Late Reversals.
Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Schizophrenia is associated with prefrontal cortex dysfunction, including neural disinhibition (reduced GABAergic inhibition) and hypoactivation ("hypofrontality"), alongside impaired reversal learning. However, evidence implicating prefrontal regions, including the rodent medial PFC (mPFC), in reversal learning is mixed. mPFC involvement may scale with demand for mPFC-dependent attention and cognitive control to overcome prepotent responses and to learn that reward contingencies can reverse, which is highest during early reversals. We therefore hypothesized that (1) the mPFC is required for early reversal learning but less important when reversal proficiency is high during late reversals. Furthermore, mPFC disinhibition may impair cognitive performance by causing circuit-level disruption outside the mPFC. Therefore, we hypothesized that (2) even when the mPFC is not required, mPFC disinhibition may impair reversal performance. To test Hypotheses 1 and 2, we first examined the effect of mPFC functional inhibition and disinhibition, by microinfusion of the GABA-A receptor agonist muscimol and antagonist picrotoxin, on early reversals (reversals 1-3) versus late reversals (reversal 5 onward) on a 2-lever discrimination task in adult male rats. mPFC functional inhibition by muscimol impaired only early reversals, increasing perseveration and impairing lose-shift behavior at reversal 2. In contrast, mPFC disinhibition by picrotoxin impaired late reversals, reducing lose-shift and win-stay behavior. Using chemogenetic mPFC disinhibition (hM4Di-mediated inhibition of GABAergic neurons), we further tested Hypothesis 2. Similar to mPFC picrotoxin, chemogenetic mPFC disinhibition impaired late reversals, primarily disrupting win-stay behavior. Our findings suggest that reduced and disinhibited mPFC activity impair distinct aspects of reversal learning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.