ArticleBMJ open2026
Interventions for socioeconomic inclusion and post-traumatic growth in youth with histories of homelessness and sex trafficking: a scoping review protocol.
Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionAlthough often treated as separate social issues, youth homelessness and sex trafficking overlap as homelessness can be both a cause and a consequence of being trafficked. The primary goal of this scoping review is to understand the existing evidence on interventions for youth who have experienced homelessness and/or sex trafficking. We will identify potential differences in intervention design based on gender and Indigeneity and for youth who identify as two-spirited, lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and/or queer.
methodsWe will use the scoping review framework originally developed by Arskey and O'Malley and later refined by Peters ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This scoping review does not involve human participants and therefore does not require approval from an institutional ethics board. However, we are dedicated to ongoing reflexivity, authentic partnerships with lived experience experts, fair compensation and efforts to reduce the risk of retraumatisation. The scoping review will inform the development of an intervention for youth who have experienced homelessness and sex trafficking and will be codesigned with lived experts. We will also disseminate our findings in peer-reviewed journals and through conference presentations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.