ArticleBMJ open2026
Aligning definitions with realities: a qualitative study on the complexities of measuring retention in HIV care in the global context.
Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRetention in HIV care is associated with higher rates of antiretroviral treatment adherence and viral suppression, as well as lower risk of AIDS-related morbidity and mortality. However, the multidimensional nature of retention complicates measurement standardisation, limiting comparability and global evaluation.
objectivesThis study explored how HIV stakeholders define and assess retention, aiming to develop a patient-centred and conceptually robust understanding to inform research and practice.
methodsWe conducted a qualitative study using interpretive description methodology, an applied qualitative approach designed to generate practice-relevant knowledge in health research. We purposively sampled 20 stakeholders representing diverse areas of expertise and geographic regions across World Bank country income classifications. We conducted and video-recorded in-depth semistructured interviews and subsequently transcribed them. Using constant comparative analysis, we identified recurring, convergent and contradictory patterns.
resultsThe analysis identified five overarching themes. The first two, exploratory themes, included Patient-Centred Understanding of Retention in HIV Care, which captured how stakeholders conceptualised retention in their respective contexts and Operationalisation of Retention Measures, which explored the key components used to measure retention. The next two explanatory themes, included Purpose-Driven Definitions of Retention, which described how retention measures were selected based on their intended use, and Building Capacity through Shared Understanding and Integrated Action, which emphasised retention as a cyclical, interconnected process dependent on collaboration between patients and health systems. The final, prescriptive theme, Advancements Shaping Retention, reflected stakeholders' shared vision of improving retention through innovations in HIV treatment and technology.
conclusionsThe findings suggest that stakeholders operationalise retention measures in line with specific objectives and individual health goals, while remaining attentive to contextual realities. Retention measures should remain flexible and patient-centred, rather than relying on a single rigid standard.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.